Indictments coming...

Page 18 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
it's also been reported that the 3 "unmasking" subpoenas were from Nunes who supposedly recused himself of everything RussiaTrumpGate.

He recused himself of the chairmanship wrt this issue, not participation in the committee. He's still Trump's guy.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,061
5,405
136
There is SO much evidence that Drumpf and many in the GOP colluded with Russia for policy shifts in exchange for Russia helping them win the election (with the primary factor being the Weiner hoax).

https://twitter.com/LouiseMensch/status/858066910130438144

This being the most explosive. It may get reported in the MSM soon. It's extensive enough that through the line of succession, it may be Orrin Hatch. It's obvious Pence knew what Flynn was up to, for example.
Pretty fucking amazing how fast this story grew and spread throughout the drumpfosphere. Cheers @Maxima1 :beer: well done sir.
 

alien42

Lifer
Nov 28, 2004
12,723
3,132
136

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,189
14,114
136
I've heard some punditry tonight to the effect that Flynn may already be cooperating with the FBI, and has been for awhile. I didn't think much about that at first, but then it occurred to me. In this early December meeting at Trump Tower, where Kushner purportedly asked the Russian ambassador to set up a back channel, only Flynn is said to have been present, apart from Kushner himself and Kislyak. Who among them leaked information about what was said? It certainly wasn't Kushner himself, or the Russians. Who could it have been other than Flynn? So Flynn told the FBI about this conversation, and someone at the FBI leaked it to the press? Seems likely.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,254
16,725
136
Oh God! Another blog entry.....................................

Come on I know you like republicans and I'm not going to slight you for that. I also understand the last two Republican presidents weren't exactly successful, I know you want a good strong Republican President but come on the spy recruiter has spoken with literally everyone in Trumps inner circle and he (the Russian spy recruiter) was at the f'ing RNC! You really should be pissed at this. Maybe Trumps not the right guy for right now. I just can't believe you don't find all these meetings odd, we don't agree on many things but you are a well thought out guy. Think why on earth is this Russian spy recruiter meeting with all these Trump guys and why the President continually goes easy on Russia and still refuses to say anything negative about Russia.
 

Roflmouth

Golden Member
Oct 5, 2015
1,059
61
46
"Here come the indictments! They'll be here any minute now! The indictments told me they're coming, they wouldn't lie to me, the indictments are my friends, I want to have the indictments' babies," say insane leftists as they thrash around in their straitjackets.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,646
4,694
136
Come on I know you like republicans and I'm not going to slight you for that. I also understand the last two Republican presidents weren't exactly successful, I know you want a good strong Republican President but come on the spy recruiter has spoken with literally everyone in Trumps inner circle and he (the Russian spy recruiter) was at the f'ing RNC! You really should be pissed at this. Maybe Trumps not the right guy for right now. I just can't believe you don't find all these meetings odd, we don't agree on many things but you are a well thought out guy. Think why on earth is this Russian spy recruiter meeting with all these Trump guys and why the President continually goes easy on Russia and still refuses to say anything negative about Russia.

I believe that these "Meetings" are being inflated.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,646
4,694
136
these "meetings" that were denied and lied about by multiple parties, yeah sure, nothing to see here.

7 Months... Nothing found...

When / If the indictments roll out and the convictions follow I'll eat my crow at that time if I have to. You should be willing to do the same if they do not have any indictments. So far the only possible one I see may be Flynn.

Edit:

Regardless. A meeting in of itself is not illegal or indicative of any crime.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,558
15,444
136
7 Months... Nothing found...

When / If the indictments roll out and the convictions follow I'll eat my crow at that time if I have to. You should be willing to do the same if they do not have any indictments. So far the only possible one I see may be Flynn.

Edit:

Regardless. A meeting in of itself is not illegal or indicative of any crime.

7 months? You do realize that the Republicans were "investigating" Benghazi for years right? I didn't see you complaining then. I sure as hell didn't see you complaining about ken starr's investigation that dragged on for three years. For a little bonus, nixons investigation took almost two years.

If indictments come down I'm sure your bitch ass will be telling everyone how you were for the investigations from the beginning.
 
Reactions: ch33zw1z

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,646
4,694
136
7 months? You do realize that the Republicans were "investigating" Benghazi for years right? I didn't see you complaining then. I sure as hell didn't see you complaining about ken starr's investigation that dragged on for three years. For a little bonus, nixons investigation took almost two years.

If indictments come down I'm sure your bitch ass will be telling everyone how you were for the investigations from the beginning.


I don't have any issue with this investigation, the Benghazi, Ken Starr or Nixon investigations. I'm not complaining. I am only pointing out that calling for a head on a platter due to perfectly legal meetings ( until proven otherwise ) is just silly. They can investigate this until the end of time as far as I am concerned. Until they have some valid proof ( a blog post doesn't count ) they aren't going to do squat. We are a long way from an indictment of any sort other than maybe Flynn. So yes I'm OK with an investigation now and I will say it in the future. Dude you are such an @SS.

Do you know of some proof of wrong doing? If so you should report it. LOL
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,617
4,708
136
"Here come the indictments! They'll be here any minute now! The indictments told me they're coming, they wouldn't lie to me, the indictments are my friends, I want to have the indictments' babies," say insane leftists as they thrash around in their straitjackets.


We're still in the subpoena stage, глупый. If you had the slightest clue how these things work, you wouldn't post such ignorant comments.
 
Reactions: ch33zw1z

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
12,289
9,125
136
I've heard some punditry tonight to the effect that Flynn may already be cooperating with the FBI, and has been for awhile. I didn't think much about that at first, but then it occurred to me. In this early December meeting at Trump Tower, where Kushner purportedly asked the Russian ambassador to set up a back channel, only Flynn is said to have been present, apart from Kushner himself and Kislyak. Who among them leaked information about what was said? It certainly wasn't Kushner himself, or the Russians. Who could it have been other than Flynn? So Flynn told the FBI about this conversation, and someone at the FBI leaked it to the press? Seems likely.

I think he's cooperating as well. But, some of the reporting on the Kushner/Kislyak meeting is suggesting that it came from Kislyak to Moscow communications after the actual meeting took place. That's why there was some talk about how someone burned a SIGINT source (Kislyak/Moscow comms channel) to leak the info.

I also think Manafort has flipped. He's been MIA and he also never filed the FARA paperwork after the fact.

Couple of point about the "blog" ... Recent MSM articles are essentially confirming info reported by Mensch months ago. First, the Kushner meeting with Kislyak in December. Second, the additional Sessions/Kislyak contacts that just came out yesterday. She's been big on Sessions for a long long time. Third, which will be even more evident next week, is her info on Comey. She has stated almost from the beginning that Comey will be a hero in the whole mess. Well, so far so good. I expect it will get better with his testimony next week.

Oh, and Mueller hired DoJ's top fraud/foreign corruption guy earlier this week.

None of this is good news for the WH. In fact, it's all fairly terrible.
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,338
1,215
126
just going on for over a month now bullshit boy. how's drumpf's 30 day isis elimination plan going?

I must have missed the "Isis elimination incoming" thread. The snowflakes can wish all they want for Trump to have colluded with the Russian boogeyman but let's see which one happens first.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
12,289
9,125
136
I must have missed the "Isis elimination incoming" thread. The snowflakes can wish all they want for Trump to have colluded with the Russian boogeyman but let's see which one happens first.

That thread was Trump's entire campaign. Remember "I'll defeat ISIS in 30 days"? Well, he's 100 overdue. Maybe all that golf got in the way.
 
Reactions: Sheik Yerbouti

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,022
2,872
136
Oh, and Mueller hired DoJ's top fraud/foreign corruption guy earlier this week.

Well the nature of Clinton's impeachment wasn't exactly what anyone anticipated in launching the Whitewater investigation.

I wonder if Trump could be held accountable as president for corrupt business practices not related to Russia's involvement in the campaign.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
12,289
9,125
136
Well the nature of Clinton's impeachment wasn't exactly what anyone anticipated in launching the Whitewater investigation.

I wonder if Trump could be held accountable as president for corrupt business practices not related to Russia's involvement in the campaign.

I would assume so. But given how there's always been speculation tying Trump to Russia via his business funding pre-campaign (thanks again Donny Jr), I'd say this hiring would fit in the overall case.

In the end, I'm guessing we see charges all over the proverbial map. Anything and everything from espionage to RICO to lying to investigators. More serious than watergate by any metric. From sheer #s of those involved, to the punishments involved.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |