Pens1566
Lifer
- Oct 11, 2005
- 13,111
- 10,461
- 136
And Trump simply "hoped" Comey could let the Flynn investigation go, he didn't order him to do so. Right?
You can't possibly be this stupid in real life, can you? Who reminds you to breathe?
And Trump simply "hoped" Comey could let the Flynn investigation go, he didn't order him to do so. Right?
President has powers you are ignoring. He can direct investigations and "hoping" something could be dropped isn't enough in any rational scenario to be obstruction of justice. I don't care who you find incompetent.
All of the obstruction evidence amounts to Comey "feeling pressured". Add in his being pissed off over getting canned and it sounds like sour grapes to me.If your assertions wrt the power of the President were true then we wouldn't have a special counsel with much broader authority than Comey ever had.
It's also important to remember that the special counsel is just gathering his team & beginning to investigate. Here on the outside, we only see bits & pieces of what they already know & what they have yet to piece together. What little we do know brings to mind a biblical adage- "The wicked flee when no man pursueth."
With the compliant Republican Congress, he'd probably be getting away with his corruption, but for his big tweeting mouth.If Trump gets impeached for obstruction of justice, I'm throwing a party. Not because I hate the guy, but because it'll be so absurd and self-inflicted there's nothing to do but laugh.
All of the obstruction evidence amounts to Comey "feeling pressured". Add in his being pissed off over getting canned and it sounds like sour grapes to me.
There will be a huge tempest over this, lots of investigating and finger pointing galore, and when all is said and done it will amount to nothing but some emotional theater.
You don't know this. Until tapes are released no one knows how he said what he said.And Trump simply "hoped" Comey could let the Flynn investigation go, he didn't order him to do so. Right?
Question, are all the "imported" names the same person, or is that some artifact of a previous database migration or something?
Context mean anything to you?You can't possibly be this stupid in real life, can you? Who reminds you to breathe?
Context mean anything to you?
I'm sure you have instances where I took things out of context at your fingertips in that case.You asking someone else to appreciate context is the fucking height of irony.
I'm sure you have instances where I took things out of context at your fingertips in that case.
That simply doesn't follow.If your assertions wrt the power of the President were true then we wouldn't have a special counsel with much broader authority than Comey ever had.
We also know that there has been many months of investigation by the FBI and other agencies who have been leaking like a sieve. It just isn't a reasonable proposition to think damning evidence exists but wouldn't have been leaked. Feinstein and others have said repeatedly that they have seen no evidence of collusion. I think you should come to grips that there isn't going to be anything to this Russian collusion fantasy and move on.It's also important to remember that the special counsel is just gathering his team & beginning to investigate. Here on the outside, we only see bits & pieces of what they already know & what they have yet to piece together. What little we do know brings to mind a biblical adage- "The wicked flee when no man pursueth."
"The requested search could not be found."
That simply doesn't follow.
We also know that there has been many months of investigation by the FBI and other agencies who have been leaking like a sieve. It just isn't a reasonable proposition to think damning evidence exists but wouldn't have been leaked. Feinstein and others have said repeatedly that they have seen no evidence of collusion. I think you should come to grips that there isn't going to be anything to this Russian collusion fantasy and move on.
Well yeah, I wasn't talking about the special counsel investigation just what he said (allegedly) to Comey about Flynn one time.Please. Trump would fire Rosenstein & Mueller if he thought he could get away with it.
He can't direct this investigation away from anywhere it wants to go, even though you attribute that kind of power to him. It'd be suicidal.
From someone who actively ignores context to maintain a position for arguing.Context mean anything to you?
Go ahead and find a single instance of this, I'll wait.From someone who actively ignores context to maintain a position for arguing.
The Earth isn't flat, either, since you seem unwilling to address the subject these days.
Go ahead and find a single instance of this, I'll wait.
Well yeah, I wasn't talking about the special counsel investigation just what he said (allegedly) to Comey about Flynn one time.
But Trump firing those two wouldn't be a legal problem but a political one. He can fire Deputy AGs all day, every day. That is within his power. Would be a political nightmare though.
Hard to sift through your posts, but here's a recent example: http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=thread...ld-now-be-a-hate-crime.2508994/#post-38943115Go ahead and find a single instance of this, I'll wait.
How is it out of context?Hard to sift through your posts, but here's a recent example: http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=thread...ld-now-be-a-hate-crime.2508994/#post-38943115
I was talking about the actual infiltration here! Not the collusion.I'm also linking this one because it's a cute adjustment: http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=thread...ng-watch-thread.2497263/page-12#post-38942863
It was all: there's no evidence of collusion! Now it's an infiltration! Which is it? Which isn't it? Who knows inside your sad little mind that can't admit the Earth isn't flat.
How is it out of context?
buckbot said:I was talking about the actual infiltration here! Not the collusion.
Infiltration is Russia doing something to affect the election.
Collusion is Russia doing something to affect the election while directly planning with the Trump campaign.
Earth isn't flat.
How many false statements can you make in one post?
Did you want me to quote the whole thing? That was the only bit I was replying to. I'm human and I could have misread it but it definitely wasn't intentional. Explain to me how I took him out of context because quoting only a portion of a quote isn't taking people out of context.Wait, now I have explain the very concept of context to you? You actively left out the context of what was said to make your "point."