Once again, I really hope that you don't choke on all that straw. Try smaller mouthfuls maybe?
Actually you don't get it. You are one of our many poster children for insisting that the left is morally correct on every issue and therefore whatever they do is just and good.
So you are quoting yourself from above, that you think that retort was so good. Pathetic be thy name.Actually you don't get it. You are one of our many poster children for insisting that the left is morally correct on every issue and therefore whatever they do is just and good.
Allow me to cordially invite you to kiss my ass and bark at the hole.just shut up, you have repeatedly proven just how incapable of an original coherent thought you are.
Trump is our current President and he is without question the most immoral and corrupt President we have EVER had.
Nope, my stance remains the same. I very seriously doubt that any collusion will be found or anyone prosecuted for activities with Russia, let alone Trump himself. I also find it amusing that those who had no problem with the Clinton Foundation accepting tens of millions from Russian businessmen while Hillary was SecState are in full flutter over those same Russians saying bad things about Hillary. (And that's not even getting started on the Red Chinese trying to buy Clinton's re-election. Posting fake Facebook info isn't a crime; accepting foreign campaign donations is.) And even if they chanced to find provable collusion - so what? Trump is not shamable. The man literally does not care what anyone thinks of him. (Which is actually fine with me - while Trump is more embarrassing, Pence is potentially more dangerous.) Mostly I'm just laughing at those who are convinced that any minute now, Trump will be brought down, Hillary will be coronated, and the world will be put right.Senator Richard Burr (R) has said Russia stole files and used them and false political ads to cause chaos in our elections.
@werepossum your name sticks out as a early denier. Have you re-evaluated your stance?
http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/04/politics/mark-warner-richard-burr-russia-investigation/index.html
Summary no evidence of collision so far, more interviews to be had and it's hard to take the Steele Dossier as fact because it's author won't speak to the committee or reveal whom paid him.
I agree with those statements
Are you providing the dog and the flashlight?Allow me to cordially invite you to kiss my ass and bark at the hole.
lol I wouldn't trust him anywhere near my ass with a dog OR a flashlight.Are you providing the dog and the flashlight?
You might be right.lol I wouldn't trust him anywhere near my ass with a dog OR a flashlight.
lol I wouldn't trust him anywhere near my ass with a dog OR a flashlight.
Nope, my stance remains the same. I very seriously doubt that any collusion will be found or anyone prosecuted for activities with Russia, let alone Trump himself. I also find it amusing that those who had no problem with the Clinton Foundation accepting tens of millions from Russian businessmen while Hillary was SecState are in full flutter over those same Russians saying bad things about Hillary. (And that's not even getting started on the Red Chinese trying to buy Clinton's re-election. Posting fake Facebook info isn't a crime; accepting foreign campaign donations is.) And even if they chanced to find provable collusion - so what? Trump is not shamable. The man literally does not care what anyone thinks of him. (Which is actually fine with me - while Trump is more embarrassing, Pence is potentially more dangerous.) Mostly I'm just laughing at those who are convinced that any minute now, Trump will be brought down, Hillary will be coronated, and the world will be put right.
I do think that as the investigation proceeds, they have a decent chance of finding some tangentially related prosecutable crime. Maybe even something Russian-related, such as failure to report income or failure to report something that must be reported. I cannot believe that given free reign and an unlimited purse, an adversarial special prosecutor cannot find something criminal that Team Trump has done.
Still consumed by irrational Hillary hate, huh?
Maybe that's how Trump came to be President...
Can't wait for the indictments to roll in.
http://thehill.com/policy/national-...sian-bribery-plot-before-obama-administration
Over the course of our conversations, one thing struck me as particularly disturbing. Smith and I talked several times about the DNC hack, and I expressed my view that the hack had likely been orchestrated by Russia and that the Kremlin was using the stolen documents as part of an influence campaign against the United States. I explained that if someone had contacted him via the “Dark Web” with Clinton’s personal emails, he should take very seriously the possibility that this may have been part of a wider Russian campaign against the United States. And I said he need not take my word for it, pointing to a number of occasions where US officials had made it clear that this was the view of the U.S. intelligence community as well.
Smith, however, didn’t seem to care. From his perspective it didn’t matter who had taken the emails, or their motives for doing so. He never expressed to me any discomfort with the possibility that the emails he was seeking were potentially from a Russian front, a likelihood he was happy to acknowledge. If they were genuine, they would hurt Clinton’s chances, and therefore help Trump.
In my conversations with Smith and his colleague, I tried to stress this point: if this dark web contact is a front for the Russian government, you really don’t want to play this game. But they were not discouraged. They appeared to be convinced of the need to obtain Clinton’s private emails and make them public, and they had a reckless lack of interest in whether the emails came from a Russian cut-out. Indeed, they made it quite clear to me that it made no difference to them who hacked the emails or why they did so, only that the emails be found and made public before the election.
and the hits keep coming...
"Putin Rival Ties Kushner Meeting to Kremlin Bankers"
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/wh...-ties-kushner-meeting-kremlin-bankers-n811631
Heh-heh, when Democrats start accusing the Republicans of doing something nefarious, it's pretty much a certainty that it's because the Democrats are already doing it and they think they're going to be exposed.Can't wait for the indictments to roll in.
http://thehill.com/policy/national-...sian-bribery-plot-before-obama-administration
Heh-heh, when Democrats start accusing the Republicans of doing something nefarious, it's pretty much a certainty that it's because the Democrats are already doing it and they think they're going to be exposed.
Mueller was just given notice. He's been around long enough to know the ramifications of the Uranium deal being brought out into the forefront. He's in it up to his eyeballs and the extraction process will begin post-haste.
Heh-heh, when Democrats start accusing the Republicans of doing something nefarious, it's pretty much a certainty that it's because the Democrats are already doing it and they think they're going to be exposed.
Mueller was just given notice. He's been around long enough to know the ramifications of the Uranium deal being brought out into the forefront. He's in it up to his eyeballs and the extraction process will begin post-haste.
You do love your duh-versions into Hillary hate.
Just more proof of how corrupt the last administration was.
So if you oppose corruption, then you oppose the Trump administration with every fiber of your being, right?
As to speaking about corruption, compare the evidence of Trump's administration to that of Obama's administration. I guess for you next trick you are going to proclaim the Earth flat.
As to speaking about corruption, compare the evidence of Trump's administration to that of Obama's administration. I guess for you next trick you are going to proclaim the Earth flat.