Apparently the only people responsible for their votes are Clinton supporters. Everyone else has been absolved from the consequences of their vote. Its truly a bizarro world we live in.
Nuh huh, you made me!!!
So Trump forced this FBI agent to text his mistress? Clinton waterboys just can't seem to keep their mouths shut.
Do you hear yourself? If the partisan waterboy already exerted influence at critical milestones on the proceedings or outcome, does that not undermine the entire investigation?Wow! So removing people who don't appear to be impartial is now a sign of the overall investigation being impartial?
Good god! Do you even hear yourself at this point?
I was denied the opportunity to vote for the candidate of my choice because it wasn't his turn, the candidate capable of beating Trump. So yes, Clinton waterboys are responsible.Apparently the only people responsible for their votes are Clinton supporters. Everyone else has been absolved from the consequences of their vote. Its truly a bizarro world we live in.
Do you hear yourself? If the partisan waterboy already exerted influence at critical milestones on the proceedings or outcome, does that not undermine the entire investigation?
Do we really want to give Trump an excuse to fire Mueller or undermine the credibility of the investigation.
Please, if someone found a social media post of an FBI agent central to these investigations wearing a MAGA hat or even in attendance at a Trump rally, you would be losing your sh!t.Now it’s ‘Clinton waterboys’? Again, you guys have lost your minds. There is no evidence that any investigation has been biased by this guy. Conservatives tend to view ‘bias’ as based on whether or not they got the outcome they wanted.
Do you hear yourself? If the partisan waterboy already exerted influence at critical milestones on the proceedings or outcome, does that not undermine the entire investigation?
Do we really want to give Trump an excuse to fire Mueller or undermine the credibility of the investigation.
I was denied the opportunity to vote for the candidate of my choice because it wasn't his turn, the candidate capable of beating Trump. So yes, Clinton waterboys are responsible.
Not unsurprising that people around here aren't talking about that. If on the other foot, they would be all about it. How it is not a big deal to them in incredible. Just more hypocrisy from the lefties here. Clear bias in a pretty big way, in several big "cases". He obviously had a bias agenda and ranked very highly. Passed judgement while having a conflict of interest to say the least. Hmmm, now where have I see this before.
Rational people also look at bias as undermining impartiality.
Rational people also recognize "one of many" as a leading indicator of a potential broader and more systemic problem.
Maybe there were many Clinton waterboys at the FBI which could explain why Comey in the end fired a torpedo at her relative to the Weiner emails.
The text messages may or may not be proof. The content or context certainly will, assuming they are released.
I already stated I am waiting to see the context of the text messages and the results of the review by the Office of the Inspector General.Do you hear yourself? If you think there is evidence he undermined the Trump investigation then please provide literally a single shred of evidence that’s the case. Otherwise concern trolling, this is ridiculous.
Please, if someone found a social media post of an FBI agent central to these investigations wearing a MAGA hat or even in attendance at a Trump rally, you would be losing your sh!t.
Please, if someone found a social media post of an FBI agent central to these investigations wearing a MAGA hat or even in attendance at a Trump rally, you would be losing your sh!t.
I already stated I am waiting to see the context of the text messages and the results of the review by the Office of the Inspector General.
I was denied the opportunity to vote for the candidate of my choice because it wasn't his turn, the candidate capable of beating Trump. So yes, Clinton waterboys are responsible.
Ask Mueller. He clearly saw enough evidence of bias. Now it is up to independent review to determine if that bias influenced outcomes.I don’t see why the context of the text messages would matter in the slightest. Show me biased professional conduct.
One. Single. Shred.
I don’t see why the context of the text messages would matter in the slightest. Show me biased professional conduct.
One. Single. Shred.
I voted for the candidate that didn't need waterboys to tip the scale in her favor, a candidate who managed to lose to the worst candidate in American political history due to her tone deafness and arrogant reliance on the momentum of inevitability.Lol. So because your guy couldn't win a primary your vote for someone other than the only other viable alternative to trump means you bear no responsibility for your vote? Amazing!
Potential indicator, not proof, worth further examinationThe proof of a biased investigation is that a biased actor that was part of the investigation was removed from the investigation, duh!
/facepalm
Not unsurprising that people around here aren't talking about that. If on the other foot, they would be all about it. How it is not a big deal to them in incredible. Just more hypocrisy from the lefties here. Clear bias in a pretty big way, in several big "cases". He obviously had a bias agenda and ranked very highly. Passed judgement while having a conflict of interest to say the least. Hmmm, now where have I see this before.
Plenty of medicine for all. Trump is undoubtedly worst, but Clinton waterboys are largely responsible for his becoming President.
I voted for the candidate that didn't need waterboys to tip the scale in her favor, a candidate who managed to lose to the worst candidate in American political history due to her tone deafness and arrogant reliance on the momentum of inevitability.
My conscience is clear.
I voted for the candidate that didn't need waterboys to tip the scale in her favor, a candidate who managed to lose to the worst candidate in American political history due to her tone deafness and arrogant reliance on the momentum of inevitability.
My conscience is clear.
The other possibility is that he wanted to remove any appearance of bias, but don't let that stop you from jumping to your preferred conclusion.Ask Mueller. He clearly saw enough evidence of bias. Now it is up to independent review to determine if that bias influenced outcomes.
Ask Mueller. He clearly saw enough evidence of bias. Now it is up to independent review to determine if that bias influenced outcomes.