This is pointless semantics. I said Sanders wasn't able to expand his appeal beyond white voters in the primary and this is undeniable. The primary electorate is also much more liberal than the GE. If Sanders couldn't win in a more liberal environment it doesn't seem logical to assume that he would have been a stronger GE candidate due to a lack of need to moderate.
I just don't see how any of this logically adds up. Sanders was not a particularly good candidate in 2016 and it showed... because he lost by a lot.
BS. A lot of the Independents hated Hillary, and it showed in the polling. She was the epitome of the establishment that so many soured on.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/feature...ayed-home-probably-cost-clinton-the-election/
Registered voters who didn’t vote were less Republican-leaning
"Let’s look first at the most newsworthy finding: Registered voters who identified as Democrats and independents were more likely than Republicans to stay home."
[...]
"The biggest reason given by non-voters for staying home was that they didn’t like the candidates.
">2 Clinton and Trump both had favorable ratings in the low 30s among registered voters who didn’t cast a ballot — both had ratings in the low 40s among those who did vote."
Last edited: