Geosurface
Diamond Member
- Mar 22, 2012
- 5,776
- 4
- 0
Imagine instead that the 6 year old boy said he was "transpecies" and thought he was a horse. And demanded to wear saddles and urinate outside...
Imagine instead that the 6 year old boy said he was "transpecies" and thought he was a horse. And demanded to wear saddles and urinate outside...
that's bullshit.
kids will play with whatever. i know a few boys that like pink until they start to be told its a "girls" color. Same with toys.
One of these days we're gonna need special restrooms and locker rooms for transexuals.
This kid wants to be identified as a girl. Do the women you are talking about want to be referred to as men? If they do, then I can respect their wishes as it impacts me not at all.
So you are arguing gender is a meaningless term that means whatever anyone(including a 6 year old) thinks it does ^_^
Seems awfully silly to segregate bathrooms based on that huh?
EDIT: If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck. It seems sensible to call it a duck no matter what the duck thinks. So if certain women choose to act like men(in regard to gender roles etc) it would seem sensible to call them men right?
Is it a function of old age to assume everything is going to be worse in the future than it was in the past? I ask because some of you are acting that way.
We need fewer Grampa Simpsons, not more.
Generations past said we wouldn't survive rock music... but we did. Perhaps it's time to stop acting like the people who are so consistently wrong about the future (senior citizens).
I think you just proved a point. We impose gender assignment on kids much more than they get to choose anything. These parents allowed more freedom to their kid.
exactly and who do we have to thank for his gender assignment? the parents.
this kid wanted to dress like (im assumeing) his sister. they took that as saying he wants to be a girl. and now trying to force others to see it as that way.
kids also want to be animals. should we allow that?
right now IF the child decides this was idiotic and he is male. he is fucked since the parents went overboard and put EVERYTHING as him being female. its now in the papers and internet for people to find when they google him.
there is a time you allow kids to play and pretend there is a time you say "no" tell them we can't do that.
IF the kid is a real transgender? fine teh option the school giving him useing the nurs's room or a gender free room is fine.
NO way should he be allowed to use the girls room. why should they be forced to change, pee, whatever whith him?
You continue to be among the worst at discourse. Your post right here is evidence of that.
Referencing my question above this post..How does that fit into your scheme? What if the person has both types of privates, but identifies as a girl?
Referencing my question above this post..How does that fit into your scheme? What if the person has both types of privates, but identifies as a girl?
Referencing my question above this post..How does that fit into your scheme? What if the person has both types of privates, but identifies as a girl?
You just don't like the stupidity of your argument pointed out to you.
You appear to be arguing that because a biologic boy wants to wear pretty pink dresses he is a girl.
Imagine instead that the captain of the HS football team who went hunting every weekend and never even touched pink decided he wanted to start identifying as a girl despite in every way appearing to be a boy. I think everyone would say that was insane and he just wanted an excuse to see naked girls in the locker room .
The only reason you think it is reasonable to consider this boy a girl, is because he has embraced traits that are associated with being a girl.
There would seem to be a certain amount of logic to assigning gender based on traits embraced by a person instead of biology.
And if we embraced this logic that would mean that a "woman" who embraced traditional male traits such as wearing pant-suits and being more interested in having a career than being a wife should be referred to as a man.
The school should make special provisions for said child to use the nurses restroom.
What I am arguing is that gender is psychological, not biological, because it is. And the points you have stated that I am making have not been made by me. You're arguing a phantom and have apparently assigned it my screenname.
Therefore I am suggesting that if a grown woman manifests traditionally masculine traits she should be regarded as a man. Just like this 6 year old boy is regarded as a girl. Of course I think most people would find that suggestion absurd.
Your suggestion about grown women is absurd.
gender is psychological, not biological
and a "woman" displays a masculine psychology. As evidenced by embracing traditionally masculine traits.
Shouldn't "she" be regarded as a man?
Why do you feel compelled to impose on others? Why can't you let people define themselves and then deal with them or don't?
Why do you feel compelled to impose on others? Why can't you let people define themselves and then deal with them or don't?
that's bullshit.
kids will play with whatever. i know a few boys that like pink until they start to be told its a "girls" color. Same with toys.