JTsyo Lifer Nov 18, 2007 11,774 919 126 Oct 25, 2012 #1 Let's who can win in a multiplayer game of Civ.
SandEagle Lifer Aug 4, 2007 16,813 13 0 Oct 25, 2012 #2 they will make up their own rules as they go along.
Rakewell Platinum Member Feb 2, 2005 2,418 1 76 Oct 25, 2012 #3 Screw CIV They should play RISK Though Romney would keep wasting men trying to take Russia, And Obama would sit on Australia and build up the whole time
Screw CIV They should play RISK Though Romney would keep wasting men trying to take Russia, And Obama would sit on Australia and build up the whole time
Ruptga Lifer Aug 3, 2006 10,247 207 106 Oct 25, 2012 #4 Rakewell said: Screw CIV They should play RISK Though Romney would keep wasting men trying to take Russia, And Obama would sit on Australia and build up the whole time Click to expand... We could make it LotR Risk, that map is a lot less campy.
Rakewell said: Screw CIV They should play RISK Though Romney would keep wasting men trying to take Russia, And Obama would sit on Australia and build up the whole time Click to expand... We could make it LotR Risk, that map is a lot less campy.
R Rastus Diamond Member Oct 10, 1999 4,704 3 0 Oct 25, 2012 #5 Rakewell said: Screw CIV They should play RISK Click to expand... I hate RISk because of that. There's always some guy browbeating everyone else into making bad trades.
Rakewell said: Screw CIV They should play RISK Click to expand... I hate RISk because of that. There's always some guy browbeating everyone else into making bad trades.
Atomic Playboy Lifer Feb 6, 2007 16,432 1 81 Oct 25, 2012 #6 For my performance, I will be reenacting the Battle of Galipoli through the time-honored art of interpretive dance. I'd vote for that guy.
For my performance, I will be reenacting the Battle of Galipoli through the time-honored art of interpretive dance. I'd vote for that guy.