I currently have an XFX Radeon HD 5670 with 1GB of RAM. My motherboard died (I hope that's all that died), so I'm upgrading all the way from an Athlon II X2 250 to an i7 4790, an ASUS H87-PLUS, and 8GB of RAM. I've been out of the game so long that I honestly don't know if it's better to use the card or just the integrated graphics. I basically stopped paying attention right when integrated graphics were starting to get real.
I really never game any more, and if it's basically a wash then I'd rather have less cards in my case for cooling purposes. But if the integrated graphics cards are still gobbling up system RAM - taking over a chunk of it that the OS loses - then I'd rather the OS get the RAM. And I do hope to game a little in the future, so I'd like to know which is better.
It's nearly impossible to find benchmarks comparing the two directly, but I was able to find this Futuremark estimate of the 5760 and benchmark of the HD 4600 with the i7 4790 that would suggest the 5760 would be faster (9770 vs. 8733), but if you just compare the HD 4600 to the HD 5760 on that Futuremark site on the 3DMark11 results, the HD 4600 blows the HD 5760 out of the water (4430 vs. 1510). Thoughts?
I really never game any more, and if it's basically a wash then I'd rather have less cards in my case for cooling purposes. But if the integrated graphics cards are still gobbling up system RAM - taking over a chunk of it that the OS loses - then I'd rather the OS get the RAM. And I do hope to game a little in the future, so I'd like to know which is better.
It's nearly impossible to find benchmarks comparing the two directly, but I was able to find this Futuremark estimate of the 5760 and benchmark of the HD 4600 with the i7 4790 that would suggest the 5760 would be faster (9770 vs. 8733), but if you just compare the HD 4600 to the HD 5760 on that Futuremark site on the 3DMark11 results, the HD 4600 blows the HD 5760 out of the water (4430 vs. 1510). Thoughts?