That does not answer my question. What's the appeal? If someone wants fast graphics what is the appeal of going with iGPU? I would consider such a fast iGPU as great for low price points but at 400$ for desktops it seems like a waste. 4770R made sense for all-in-ones where form factor didn't allow any dGPU but I would never settle for a fraction of performance in games for a subtly more compact case.
I'd use it as a stream box. I can still play Dota natively, but I can stream higher quality games if I want. I currently use my laptop to do this hooked up to my projector. But, that'd replace it all, and sit in a tiny box right next to my projector.
I'd like to see this in a NUC/socketed form.
Edit: TBH, if it offered the same performance as the line right bellow it, and just had a beefier IGPU, I'd get it. I would then buy more high end GPUs, and offload them at a higher value since I could always fall back on the iGPU. I think Skylake is the beginning of that being an ok option. I think the next step or two intel will take may or may not change the game based on the dGPU sector. Thing is, Intel has their fab benefit on their side as well as tons of money
Also, where are the OC results? Do OC results normally take this long I don't know much about OCing.