That is the problem though, I doubt it will overclock better than Haswell, perhaps not as well, based on BW-C. So all we are left with is a measly 5% ipc gain and a 1000.00 plus 10 core monster that will be a very niche product.
We don't know how it'll overclock. Because Broadwell C is basically mobile with a desktop socket. There were rumors about that as well.
Or else why would Skylake improve on it so much?
(Very close (within 4%) to the theoretical 1.92x (0.52x), but quite a bit below BDY-Y's 2.2x.)
I don't think transistor density data is useful at all. Outside of engineers that designed them, we don't really know to the full extent what they do. 90nm Prescott had 125 million transistors which was well over 2x over 0.13u Northwood, but the speculation is most of them were for something not important to us(like better debugging circuits or such).
Broadwell Y has greater reduction because there's much less I/O and logic circuits that don't scale as well. Graphics and cache does which Y has plenty of.
So the ONLY real judgment of how a process fares is on the product itself. I'd say for PC their 22nm and 14nm sucks.