Nothingness
Diamond Member
- Jul 3, 2013
- 3,075
- 2,072
- 136
Possibly the Author of HWInfo32 knows something most others don't or it's a bug. Going by the latter and SDE default CPUID's for relevant RDSEED, SHA and AVX512 gives...
Broadwell
RDSEED
Skylake Client
RDSEED
Skylake Server
RDSEED, AVX512VL, AVX512BW, AVX512CD, AVX512DQ, AVX512F
Knights Landing
RDSEED, AVX512CD, AVX512ER, AVX512PF, AVX512F
Cannonlake
RDSEED, SHA, AVX512VL, AVX512BW, AVX512CD, AVX512IFMA, AVX512DQ, AVX512F
Goldmont
RDSEED, SHA
Not bad. That is up 25% fromhttp://www.fanlesstech.com/2014/09/entire-broadwell-u-lineup.html
most interesting cpu for me :
Core i3-5157U (2.5 GHz / 2C4T / Iris Graphics 6100 / 28W TDP)
There are no architectural details known about Goldmont.So no SHA for Skylake, but at least they're putting it in Goldmont to fend off the ARMy in Geekbench
There are no architectural details known about Goldmont.
Funny, the column are mislabeled on the first slide.
It's better than that: it's 25% up with almost half TDP (the text says 28W, but the slide says 15W).Not bad. That is up 25% from
Core i3-4158U Iris 5100 (GT3) 28 W / 2.0 GHz
The impact won't be that big on total score since Geekbench uses geometric mean.One of the big weaknesses for Intel chips on Geekbench 3 is lack of hardware SHA support for the SHA subtests, so I'd expect a big improvement in that section of the benchmark.
So we're having benchmark driven innovation?One of the big weaknesses for Intel chips on Geekbench 3 is lack of hardware SHA support for the SHA subtests, so I'd expect a big improvement in that section of the benchmark.
I don't think it will be 15W since the name suggests that this is the successor in Intel's 28W U series.It's better than that: it's 25% up with almost half TDP (the text says 28W, but the slide says 15W).
So the slides are fakeI don't think it will be 15W since the name suggests that this is the successor in Intel's 28W U series.
So we're having benchmark driven innovation?
The impact won't be that big on total score since Geekbench uses geometric mean.
So we're having benchmark driven innovation?
Remember that TDP is just a specification and not the maximum power that can be used (providing the hardware is up to it).http://www.fanlesstech.com/2014/09/entire-broadwell-u-lineup.html
most interesting cpu for me :
Core i3-5157U (2.5 GHz / 2C4T / Iris Graphics 6100 / 28W TDP)
and
Core i5-5250U (1.6-2.7 GHz / 2C4T / HD Graphics 6000 / 15W TDP)
15W with full 48 EUs
The SDE provides a means for emulating newer instructions without the hardware. While having those instructions doesn't mean they are written in stone (TSX for example), it does add a lot of weight to them being there.There are no architectural details known about Goldmont.
Emulation support for the Intel® Secure Hash Algorithm (Intel® SHA) extensions present on the Intel Goldmont microarchtiecture.
Processor choices are listed as either a 5th generation Intel Broadwell-U Celeron or Core i3 processor.
RAM & onboard will span the usual 2GB/16GB, 4GB/32GB offerings, with 802.11ac Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0 and a smattering of USB 3.0 and HDMI out ports to cater to expansion needs coming as standard on all variants.
Finally, the only other information our friendly neighbourhood Chrome Bandit has passed to us is the release date: March 2015.
The big sell here is that at least one of these devices will come bearing Intel’s fifth-generation Broadwell-based processors, providing users with a huge boost in performance, battery life and graphics performance.
Really, all those high-end iGPUs at 15W TDP are meaningless. Those SKUs cannot use 100% of that iGPU performance capabilities.
To give some perspective if I put the best SHA numbers from Cortex-A57 into the best Moorefield score, the Moorefield integer score will go from 1026 up to 1223, and the total score will go from 944 up to 1001. Certainly not insignificant, but far from allowing to reach A57 (or even A17 which doesn't even have AES and SHA) scores.Ah, interesting! Thanks, Nothingness!
They might be (fairly) meaningless at 22nm, but likely not a 14nm, certainly not with Duty Cycle Control and the improved efficiency of Gen8. We'll see.
They might be (fairly) meaningless at 22nm, but likely not a 14nm, certainly not with Duty Cycle Control and the improved efficiency of Gen8. We'll see.
No HDMI 2.0 tho, so turn off for me.
My old i5 661 HTPC would like to be replaced with a NUC type one. But seems it needs to wait 1-1½ year still.
There's always AMD But tbh if you want to drive a 4k display, I'd wait for something with full h.265 hardware decode.
Nah just pick this now: http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Blue...tex-A17-1-8GHz-TV-BOX-4K-x-2K/2021695712.htmli.e. Skylake.
There's always AMD But tbh if you want to drive a 4k display, I'd wait for something with full h.265 hardware decode.