ehume
Golden Member
- Nov 6, 2009
- 1,511
- 73
- 91
. . .
If the OC ceiling is now even lower than a stock 4790K the entire OCing scene will pretty much be dead if Intel maintains stock clocks from Haswell.
Overclocking will never be dead.
. . .
If the OC ceiling is now even lower than a stock 4790K the entire OCing scene will pretty much be dead if Intel maintains stock clocks from Haswell.
Overclocking will never be dead.
I very suspicious of stellar OCing results even if it was real because who knows what kind of cherrypicking was done behind the scenes to get those clocks.
Overclocking will never be dead.
Thanks for the link, but that is just like a desktop. The iris pro is wasted. The point was a cheaper one using the iris pro for light gaming.
Is nothing sacred? This is Fugger man! Read the thread, it's not like he's hyping the chip . . . the results under phase were frankly awful. Not like it was his fault. Cold just didn't help. Not one tiddly bit. For the XS faithful that's probably disappointing, but for those of us who will never touch anything better than an AiO or a dual-tower HSF, it's certainly not bad news.
Even if you are suspicious of the results, read the detail he goes into on RAM speeds, power domains, etc. It's educational for anyone that's interested in Broadwell.
Damn right.
Are you asking if 4.8Ghz@1.55V is more plausible than 4.8Ghz@1.42V? Suddenly Broadwell jumped from less voltage than Haswell @ 4.7Ghz+ to needing significantly more voltage, yet you still believe the original report was 100% genuine?Also, for those of you who thought the HKEPC OC was fake . . . do you also think Fugger is a fake?
Are you asking if 4.8Ghz@1.55V is more plausible than 4.8Ghz@1.42V? Suddenly Broadwell jumped from less voltage than Haswell @ 4.7Ghz+ to needing significantly more voltage, yet you still believe the original report was 100% genuine?
Are you asking if 4.8Ghz@1.55V is more plausible than 4.8Ghz@1.42V? Suddenly Broadwell jumped from less voltage than Haswell @ 4.7Ghz+ to needing significantly more voltage, yet you still believe the original report was 100% genuine?
Not sure if anyone has posted this, it's a Gadavari review but there's a lot of Core i5 5675C benchmarks:
http://fcenter.ru/online/hardarticles/processors/38489-Obzor_processora_AMD_A10_7870K_Godavari
If there aren't enough results showing Broadwell-K outclassing Kaveri/Godavari at 1080p, here's some more:
<Snip>
Intel 5675C: $276
AMD 7870K: $137
Intel 5675C: $276
AMD 7870K: $137
And worth it!
Twice the price for 20% better gaming performance is worth it?
You're better off spending that extra money on a discrete gfx card.
Twice the price for 20% better gaming performance is worth it?
You're better off spending that extra money on a discrete gfx card.
Twice the price for 20% better gaming performance is worth it?
You're better off spending that extra money on a discrete gfx card.