next year thenWhat was I thinking, as if I could buy an 8700K without being glued to my PC, refreshing pages, etc. I'm going to wait until stock is good.
Maybe... Luckily I have no real need, just a burning desire, lol.next year then
Why does it always have to be AMD vs Intel or AMD vs Nvidia? Why cannot we discuss products, as they are?Intel is back in business. 8700k is a fantastic product . Massive ST and gaming perf lead over Ryzen 7/5 and very competitive MT against the 1800x even beating it out in few benchmarks . Intel's 8400 is winning comprehensively against R5 1500X and beating R5 1600 in ST and gaming. Right now Intel's biggest challenge will be to meet the demand for 8700k. All hail the new mainstream king - 8700k.
I bought the Asus mITX. It actually has 2 M.2 slots. One on the front and one on the back. That's why I bought it over the ASROCK.
Damn, the 8700k is so *hot* even Microcenter can't help but turn greedy overnight. Lawd!Microcenter has the 8700K for ... $499!!!!
http://www.microcenter.com/search/search_results.aspx?Ntt=8700k
Damn, the 8700k is so *hot* even Microcenter can't help but turn greedy overnight. Lawd!
Why does it always have to be AMD vs Intel or AMD vs Nvidia? Why cannot we discuss products, as they are?
Any product is always discussed with respect to the competition Eg : Apple A11 vs Snapdragon 835 , Vega 64 vs GTX 1080, 8700k vs R7 1800X . These new Intel CPU products do not exist in a void today like they did in the past 5 years from 2011-2016 when AMD did not have anything interesting in the CPU market. More importantly when there was no competition Intel never gave a product worth discussing in terms of a big improvement over previous gen. 8700k is the first CPU from Intel since the 2600k which has got everyone excited about upgrading. Its no surprise that the Coffelake launch has been pulled in because of the stiff competition. So if not for the competition you might have got the 8700k sometime in H1 2018. So yes we can discuss products as they are without referencing the competition but thats the individual's choice not yours.
On the reverse logic, we could've gotten these chips earlier too, but someone was not competitive for like ten whole years, and we're supposed to be grateful all of a sudden? Intel's 10nm process is more responsible for this (in a negative way), and not AMD.Any product is always discussed with respect to the competition Eg : Apple A11 vs Snapdragon 835 , Vega 64 vs GTX 1080, 8700k vs R7 1800X . These new Intel CPU products do not exist in a void today like they did in the past 5 years from 2011-2016 when AMD did not have anything interesting in the CPU market. More importantly when there was no competition Intel never gave a product worth discussing in terms of a big improvement over previous gen. 8700k is the first CPU from Intel since the 2600k which has got everyone excited about upgrading. Its no surprise that the Coffelake launch has been pulled in because of the stiff competition. So if not for the competition you might have got the 8700k sometime in H1 2018. So yes we can discuss products as they are without referencing the competition but thats the individual's choice not yours.
ONLY you want to acclaim a winner here. What for? What benefit to the world will it bring?Any product is always discussed with respect to the competition Eg : Apple A11 vs Snapdragon 835 , Vega 64 vs GTX 1080, 8700k vs R7 1800X . These new Intel CPU products do not exist in a void today like they did in the past 5 years from 2011-2016 when AMD did not have anything interesting in the CPU market. More importantly when there was no competition Intel never gave a product worth discussing in terms of a big improvement over previous gen. 8700k is the first CPU from Intel since the 2600k which has got everyone excited about upgrading. Its no surprise that the Coffelake launch has been pulled in because of the stiff competition. So if not for the competition you might have got the 8700k sometime in H1 2018. So yes we can discuss products as they are without referencing the competition but thats the individual's choice not yours.
HahaI'm thinking the 8700 non-k is going to be my baby.
The 8700 is the sweetspot. It's a versatile chip.I'm thinking the 8700 non-k is going to be my baby.
ONLY you want to acclaim a winner here. What for? What benefit to the world will it bring?
There is ZERO Objectivity in acclaiming winners anywhere. Both companies have strong and weak spots. Saying that one is better than the other is just showing your preferences, nothing else. That is why - why do we have always talk about one company versus the other, and not just the products themselves?
On the reverse logic, we could've gotten these chips earlier too, but someone was not competitive for like ten whole years, and we're supposed to be grateful all of a sudden? Intel's 10nm process is more responsible for this (in a negative way), and not AMD.
Yep. Now let's get back to discussing our builds and assume that everyone here read the same reviews that everyone else did, decided that CFL is the way they wanted to go, and is now building.
I couldn't find the Maximus APEX board available, so right now I am deciding between the Z370 ROG Strix-E and the Z370 Maximus X Hero.
The Hero is fancy, but I don't think I'll use all of its fancy features. I just want a board that will not keep me from getting a >5GHz OC.