Arachnotronic
Lifer
- Mar 10, 2006
- 11,715
- 2,012
- 126
Intel is now on the "third" generation of the exact same architecture and yet somehow on the third motherboard chipset.
They added 50% more cores to the chip and frequency ceiling is much higher than the first-gen version of this "exact same architecture," as you put it.
More cores means greater power delivery requirements, it's as simple as that.
If Intel maintained backwards compatibility but people couldn't get the maximum overclock out of the chip (or blew their boards up), then you would have people complaining on the forums about how Intel misled customers by claiming backwards compatibility.
Basically, Intel couldn't have won this battle either way, so might as well do it right with a revised socket/platform design.