Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread

Page 367 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,375
2,255
136
X86 Skylake + L2 core - 217 million transistors.

X86 CypressCove + L2 core - 300 (+ 38% to Skylake) million transistors.

The 10 Skylake cores are 2.17 billion transistors.

The 8 CypressCove cores are 2.4 billion transistors, which is 11.6% larger than the 10 Skylake cores. 8 CypressCove cores have an area of 11 Skylake cores.


The hypothetical 10 CypressCove cores already have 3 billion transistors and 38% more surface area than the 10 Skylake cores.
10 CypressCove cores would be approximately 14 Skylake cores.

Plus I would think the Generation 12 graphics in RKL has significantly more transistors than Gen 9 graphics in Skylake.
Or is RKL using Generation 11 graphics from Ice Lake?
 

Staples

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2001
4,952
119
106
Sorry if it has been asked (and it probably has) but when do we think 11th Gen desktop CPUs will come out in OEM machines? I am a fan of 1L micro form factor machines and if Xe is right around the corner, I want to know how much longer I need to wait.
 

uzzi38

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2019
2,703
6,405
146
Sorry if it has been asked (and it probably has) but when do we think 11th Gen desktop CPUs will come out in OEM machines? I am a fan of 1L micro form factor machines and if Xe is right around the corner, I want to know how much longer I need to wait.

Yes, and I think we'll more likely see TGL-H over RKL-S in those sorts of form factors. Iirc wasn't there supposed to be a Ghost Canyon NUC refresh with TGL-H for example?
 

Dave2150

Senior member
Jan 20, 2015
639
178
116
Any thoughts on the decision to go with the 11900k on release, or wait for Alder-Lake?

I'm on a 6700k currently, and a few of my games are really needing > 4C8T. Guess this depends on whether Alder-Lake is delayed from 2H 2021 or not, hmm!
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
14,841
5,456
136
Any thoughts on the decision to go with the 11900k on release, or wait for Alder-Lake?

I'm on a 6700k currently, and a few of my games are really needing > 4C8T. Guess this depends on whether Alder-Lake is delayed from 2H 2021 or not, hmm!

11900K isn't going to be worth it over the 11700K.
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,214
3,631
126
Any thoughts on the decision to go with the 11900k on release, or wait for Alder-Lake?

I'm on a 6700k currently, and a few of my games are really needing > 4C8T. Guess this depends on whether Alder-Lake is delayed from 2H 2021 or not, hmm!
Playing the wait for the next best thing is often a losing game. There is always a next best thing, so you can get trapped into never buying. The exception is when the next best thing is just about to be released. Alder Lake's release date is a big question mark and its gaming impact is an even bigger question mark. If I were you, then I would wait only if (A) you really don't feel the need to upgrade now and it is just a want and (B) Rocket Lake's high power consumption has a meaningful impact to you. Considering that it is a desktop that you'll likely pair with an even more power hungry video card, item (B) might not really be meaningful to you.

The 11700k and 11900k should be released in a few weeks. They should be a big improvement over your 6700K. I agree with jpiniero, that the 11900K probably is not going to be worth it over the 11700k. Unless Intel has a surprise up their sleeves with the 11900k, a 6% faster single-core turbo and 4% faster all core turbo is not enough to really even notice.
 
Last edited:

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,198
3,185
136
www.teamjuchems.com
Playing the wait for the next best thing is often a losing game. There is always a next best thing, so you can get trapped into never buying. The exception is when the next best thing is just about to be released. Alder Lake's release date is a big question mark and its gaming impact is an even bigger question mark. If I were you, then I would wait only if (A) you really don't feel the need to upgrade now and it is just a want and (B) Rocket Lake's high power consumption has a meaningful impact to you. Considering that it is a desktop that you'll likely pair with an even more power hungry video card, item (B) might not really be meaningful to you.

The 11700k and 11900k should be released in a few weeks. They should be a big improvement over your 6700K. I agree with jpiniero, that the 11900K probably is not going to be worth it over the 11700k. Unless Intel has a surprise up their sleeves with the 11900k, a 6% faster single-core turbo and 4% faster all core turbo is not enough to really even notice.

Yeah, pricing rumors seem to indicate $350 to $400 on the 117, $450-$500+ on the 119. I feel like the 117 will offer significant value to gamers in 2021 and the 119 exists as halo/gold sample model for those willing to put up with even higher power consumption in pursuit of really high numbers.

And it exists to plumb the wallets of those who are looking for the "best" and only are considering Intel, a market segment which I assume is not insignificant.
 

Dave2150

Senior member
Jan 20, 2015
639
178
116
11900K isn't going to be worth it over the 11700K.

I considered as much, though most interested in how Rocket Lake in general will compare VS Alder Lake.

I've had Skylake (6700k) since release in August 2015 and was determined to wait for an actual new architecture before upgrading. Now that we're getting two new architectures in the same year, I'd like to know if Alder Lake is worth waiting for or not!
 

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,198
3,185
136
www.teamjuchems.com
I considered as much, though most interested in how Rocket Lake in general will compare VS Alder Lake.

I've had Skylake (6700k) since release in August 2015 and was determined to wait for an actual new architecture before upgrading. Now that we're getting two new architectures in the same year, I'd like to know if Alder Lake is worth waiting for or not!

If you've got decent GPU, I wouldn't wait. Buy it and enjoy it.

It's not this simple, but it somewhat like Sandy Bridge to Ivy Bridge. In retrospect, while it is undeniable IVB is both faster and more power efficient, in terms of real world usage a year or two later even what did it matter if you were upgrading from a Core 2 Duo? Both were amazing options
 
Reactions: Tlh97 and Mopetar

Dave2150

Senior member
Jan 20, 2015
639
178
116
And it exists to plumb the wallets of those who are looking for the "best" and only are considering Intel, a market segment which I assume is not insignificant.

Not really. I was trying to buy a 5900x or 5950x on release, though I still can't find one in stock. The Ryzen 5000 parts I can find in stock are at heavily scalped prices.
 

Dave2150

Senior member
Jan 20, 2015
639
178
116
If you've got decent GPU, I wouldn't wait. Buy it and enjoy it.

It's not this simple, but it somewhat like Sandy Bridge to Ivy Bridge. In retrospect, while it is undeniable IVB is both faster and more power efficient, in terms of real world usage a year or two later even what did it matter if you were upgrading from a Core 2 Duo? Both were amazing options

Do we know for sure that the IPC jump from Rocket Lake to Alder Lake will be as small as the jump from Sandy to Ivy? If that's the case I won't bother to wait.
 

yuri69

Senior member
Jul 16, 2013
438
720
136
Sandy to Ivy? That would be Sunny Cove to Willow Cove.

Rocket to Alder Lake IPC jump alone should be 20%. The recent GeekBench leak points to even higher gains...
 

coercitiv

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2014
6,400
12,857
136
Do we know for sure that the IPC jump from Rocket Lake to Alder Lake will be as small as the jump from Sandy to Ivy? If that's the case I won't bother to wait.
Golden Cove was marked with "ST performace" tag on Intel's slide for upcoming architectures, the same tag as Sunny Cove. At the very least I would expect a 10% IPC bump, if not the expected ~18-19% that's being talked about on the forums. Couple that with a far more efficient node and come winter holidays Rocket Lake will look worse than Comet Lake looks today.

If all you want is keep up with gaming demands, get yourself a heavily discounted 6c/12t Comet Lake or one i5 RKL-S + non-Z board with enabled memory oc features. This will carry you nicely until next year.
 

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,198
3,185
136
www.teamjuchems.com
Sandy to Ivy? That would be Sunny Cove to Willow Cove.

Rocket to Alder Lake IPC jump alone should be 20%. The recent GeekBench leak points to even higher gains...

Yeah, you are right. I am not sure what would be in more historical perspective. The updates from Sandy through Skylake felt so iterative. Is that like Sandy to Haswell or all the way to Skylake?

I still feel like holding out, after having done so for so long with my 5930k, just keeps rolling. Then Alder Lake gets delayed, Zen 4 is right on the horizon, etc.

Unless you have a crazy GPU or willing to pay $2k what's the point? AMD 12 and 16 core parts are going to better for most scalable workloads so if we are talking Intel I presume gaming is of priority performance. ~$350 for a top eight core part in 2021 is 🤷‍♂️ Seems pretty reasonable TBH. I guess it really remains to be seen how it compares to the 5600x in gaming in real benchmarks. Thankfully March is coming soon.
 
Last edited:

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,375
2,255
136
11900K isn't going to be worth it over the 11700K.

I tend to agree with this. I write "tend" because it still depends on what the actual street prices turn out to be. I don't think I'll be waiting for ADL. I'll probably upgrade my mobo/CPU/RAM to RKL at the end of the summer when RKL prices have dropped and preliminary ADL is known.

I have thought about buying a low end Comet Lake CPU now with a RKL capable motherboard and then upgrading later but it risky to play that game with the highly dynamic world of computer tech. That plan only worked out for me once with my current Haswell rig. I bought a really cheap Haswell processor, used it for like a year and then when the 4770k went on sale for $199.99 at my local Microcenter picked it up and sold the old Haswell CPU on ebay. That was the only time that gamble ever worked out for me.

But, I'd be lying if I haven't and still am thinking about buying a 10100 for $100 and then upgrading to RKL later. This would only be a 15% performance upgrade but it would be super cheap as well. It's just that urge to tinker that makes me want to do this.... and I could move that stuff into my HTPC later... see, I'm convincing myself!
 

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,198
3,185
136
www.teamjuchems.com
I tend to agree with this. I write "tend" because it still depends on what the actual street prices turn out to be. I don't think I'll be waiting for ADL. I'll probably upgrade my mobo/CPU/RAM to RKL at the end of the summer when RKL prices have dropped and preliminary ADL is known.

I have thought about buying a low end Comet Lake CPU now with a RKL capable motherboard and then upgrading later but it risky to play that game with the highly dynamic world of computer tech. That plan only worked out for me once with my current Haswell rig. I bought a really cheap Haswell processor, used it for like a year and then when the 4770k went on sale for $199.99 at my local Microcenter picked it up and sold the old Haswell CPU on ebay. That was the only time that gamble ever worked out for me.

But, I'd be lying if I haven't and still am thinking about buying a 10100 for $100 and then upgrading to RKL later. This would only be a 15% performance upgrade but it would be super cheap as well. It's just that urge to tinker that makes me want to do this.... and I could move that stuff into my HTPC later... see, I'm convincing myself!

Haha, well... maybe wait until the new chipsets drop and pull the MC trick and get that sweet OEM 10400f for like $130 instead? I mean, you should get the $30 in resale bump I would think and get a solid CPU with real gains on your current setup as well.

Unlike the 10100f that gives up the motherboard discount and is therefore a terrible value compared to the retail non-f box, the 10400 has the $20 board discount.
 

Staples

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2001
4,952
119
106
Yes, and I think we'll more likely see TGL-H over RKL-S in those sorts of form factors. Iirc wasn't there supposed to be a Ghost Canyon NUC refresh with TGL-H for example?
The Phantom Canyon NUC is what you are probably talking about. Although the GPU is great (RTX 2060), they are putting a 1165G7 CPU in it which is very disappointing. It is coming in March supposedly.
 

Zucker2k

Golden Member
Feb 15, 2006
1,810
1,159
136
And it exists to plumb the wallets of those who are looking for the "best" and only are considering Intel, a market segment which I assume is not insignificant.
Unless the 11900k is going to overclock all cores to 5.5GHz consistently, I think the 11700k is always going to be at 11900k clocks through overclocking. I think the ceiling is going to be the same due to power and thermal limitations.
 
Reactions: Tlh97 and blckgrffn

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,375
2,255
136
Unless the 11900k is going to overclock all cores to 5.5GHz consistently, I think the 11700k is always going to be at 11900k clocks through overclocking. I think the ceiling is going to be the same due to power and thermal limitations.

It's really very interesting how overclocking has changed over the years. It used to be that could change various parameters, increase cooling, and get the highest frequency your particular piece of "organized sand" could reliably manage.

Then Intel started locking things down and we had to buy "K" parts.

Then as competition heated up between AMD and Intel and power/thermal efficiency also came to the forefront various technologies were incorporated into the processors to allow them to clock up and down depending on workload and available cooling solutions.

Now it seems most any processor will clock itself up to it's and the available cooling limits, taking most of the tweaking out of our hands. It's really just a game of having good cooling and getting a good processor.

So I'm thinking the only real difference between say the 11900 vs 11900k vs 11700 vs 11700k will be the yield of the various parts. This seems to implicate that buying a 11700 early in RKL "life" means you may end up with a part that hits the target clocks but at higher thermals.

One indication of this could be availability of the 11900k parts at release. If they are widely available I may buy a 11700k because I would be thinking 11900k yields might be bleeding into the 11700 series parts and I could get a good one. But if 11900k's aren't available then 11700 series parts surely aren't going to be "good" ones. Ian's recent comparison of the 10700 and 10700k showed two parts that are essentially the same except for power/thermals, due to yield.

Then again Intel has the 14++++++++++++++++ process down pretty well after 6 years so they may be able to flood the market with RKL to put a damper on 5xxx parts that are available to basically hold of AMD until Alder Lake arrives.

We shall see soon enough. Has Intel said anything about a RKL release date?
 

mikk

Diamond Member
May 15, 2012
4,173
2,211
136
Yeah, you are right. I am not sure what would be in more historical perspective. The updates from Sandy through Skylake felt so iterative. Is that like Sandy to Haswell or all the way to Skylake?


Not sure but both were tock releases and Golden Cove is a "tock" release as well. All of the last tock releases from Intel brought within 10-20% better Singlethread IPC over the prior generations. We don't have hard numbers from Golden Cove (Alder Lake) but there is hope for a good improvement, I remember what Raja Koduri told last year about ADL.

Asked what enthusiasts should be excited about in the future with Intel, he replied:

"Alderlake – it was only a small part of our Architecture Day event, but it’s the biggest architecture movement since the Core architecture in 2006. It’s a huge leap and will be very exciting. I'm a PC enthusiast myself and I'm very excited by what Alder Lake will offer.
 

gdansk

Platinum Member
Feb 8, 2011
2,492
3,394
136
I'm really looking forward to running BSD on Alder Lake. I'm sure they'll figure out the big + little core migration by 2030.
 
Reactions: blckgrffn

SAAA

Senior member
May 14, 2014
541
126
116
Do we know for sure that the IPC jump from Rocket Lake to Alder Lake will be as small as the jump from Sandy to Ivy? If that's the case I won't bother to wait.

Sandy to Ivy? That would be Sunny Cove to Willow Cove.

Rocket to Alder Lake IPC jump alone should be 20%. The recent GeekBench leak points to even higher gains...

Indeed, if Alder is actually running at 3.4GHz that's 45% over good old Skylake.

Golden Cove was marked with "ST performace" tag on Intel's slide for upcoming architectures, the same tag as Sunny Cove. At the very least I would expect a 10% IPC bump, if not the expected ~18-19% that's being talked about on the forums. Couple that with a far more efficient node and come winter holidays Rocket Lake will look worse than Comet Lake looks today.

If all you want is keep up with gaming demands, get yourself a heavily discounted 6c/12t Comet Lake or one i5 RKL-S + non-Z board with enabled memory oc features. This will carry you nicely until next year.

I think that should clear the IPC argument. Rocket lake coming so late, now 2021, is totally getting crushed by the successor, mind it will be an improvement over anything Skylake based but it's a side-step on multi-threaded performance.
Alder lake too won't be that much better: say if the 8 small cores scale well maybe you are looking at 12 "Rocket lake equivalent cores" for the latest and greatest of 10 nm, that's not really a good improvement given the growth from 4 to 10 cores on 14nm alone.

At this point I wonder what will be after Alder Lake, like if that's a core moment then we are looking for core quads in just two years? 2023 and 7nm (or 5nm TSMC...) with twice the big cores?
Given what they are doing with GPUs using dozens of joined dices if they really pull it off Meteor Lake could be worth waiting for. Rocket lake would be a stepping stone for anyone on too old CPUs, unless you are looking for Zen of course ;-)
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |