80W is possibly a no iGPU Mehlow version.
Well, I've never even entertained the idea that there would be an iGPU on this chip. I don't imagine anyone is expecting that. I'm not sure why intel would consider side saddling their anemic gpu on this, it seems utterly pointless.
The only way putting a GPU next to this thing makes any sense is if they use AMD's GPU again, at least it would be useful.
But, i don't think there is any chance of this containing a GPU on chip or on package. I'm not entirely convinced this mythical CPU even exists, with or without GPU.
-They would essentially be building a single CPU with really only one usable SKU. How would they position the harvested chips with failed cores and how can they can compete on price with AMD's low cost and high yielding modular 8 core chips.
-How long ago would have they had to add this to the roadmap in order to design and release it this year(?). Probably at least 3 years, at the time when they would have been designing 10nm chips. I suppose there is a glimmer of a possibility that they ported everything back to 14nm when they realized 10nm is a disaster. What would that do to their business model though? Moving it back to 14nm would balloon the die size, TDP and/or wreak havok on clocks, and likely hurt yields, compared to their 10nm plans.
-Another glimmer of a possibility is if this has an intel 'GPU' on board and was ported back to 14nm from the originally intended 10nm when they realized 10nm was a disaster, and first caught wind of what Ryzen was going to be. But that only makes sense if they replace the entire CL stack with harvested whateverLake dies. This would surely drop their margins dramatically due to the Ryzen factor.