What are you talking about? We have some SKU lists for SPR, and 56c models are certainly there. Do you somehow think yields are worse a year after SPR and 2+ after ADL?
What are you talking about? We have some SKU lists for SPR, and 56c models are certainly there. Do you somehow think yields are worse a year after SPR and 2+ after ADL?Golden Cove Server is a wee bit bigger than Gracemont. Just a tad.
What are you talking about? We have some SKU lists for SPR, and 56c models are certainly there. Do you somehow think yields are worse a year after SPR and 2+ after ADL?
I belive that he thinks that you are talking about Alder Lake 13/15 Core CPUsWhat are you talking about? We have some SKU lists for SPR, and 56c models are certainly there. Do you somehow think yields are worse a year after SPR and 2+ after ADL?
Iirc, the smaller ADL mobile die contained some extra power optimizations, but not sure what.Interestingly this review shows Alderlake-U 9W having great battery life. Greater than 14.5 hours using 51WHr battery is fantastic.
While the reviewer criticizes it having low performance, the MT performance rivals 15W Tigerlake despite only having 10W sustained. Also unlike Amberlake and previous low TDP attempts, this chip does not suffer from noticeably lower single thread results. Single thread performance is only 10% behind top Tigerlake which is an excellent result. This is twice the MT performance of Y chips, and those chips had MT performance at a standstill since the Broadwell Core M.
The reviewer conclusion is as always with the modern press, mediocre at the best. I don't remember them complaining when Tigerlake had 2/3rd MT performance of Renoir. Why the change in attitude now?
This is Amberlake class efficiency and what I hoped to see with Lakefield. This device achieves better battery life per WHr than Lakefield! I wouldn't have minded getting this device at all. This is a great progress and I would even call it Hybrid Unleashed.
I wonder if the problems aren't fundamental but higher level such as system and firmware settings? Otherwise this difference should not be possible. While this laptop benefits having 15W PL2, it shouldn't matter this much. Perhaps the discrepancy lies in the greater than normal binning differences between the 9/15/-P chips?
E-cores definitely profit of not being fed too much voltage. P-cores not being able to run too much into inefficiency territory is also good. Though the i5-1230U can have a PL2 of up to 29W so it being limited to 15W on that laptop is somewhat unfortunate, especially since the max frequency of 4.4GHz for P-cores and 3.3GHz for E-cores are actually pretty sane.While this laptop benefits having 15W PL2, it shouldn't matter this much.
E-cores definitely profit of not being fed too much voltage. P-cores not being able to run too much into inefficiency territory is also good. Though the i5-1230U can have a PL2 of up to 29W so it being limited to 15W on that laptop is somewhat unfortunate, especially since the max frequency of 4.4GHz for P-cores and 3.3GHz for E-cores are actually pretty sane.
Having a full fledged BIOS in a laptop with underclocking/undervolting options would be awesome.Though the i5-1230U can have a PL2 of up to 29W so it being limited to 15W on that laptop is somewhat unfortunate, especially since the max frequency of 4.4GHz for P-cores and 3.3GHz for E-cores are actually pretty sane.
My theory: when ADL taped out, the engineers knew they had a battery life regression. It was too late to do anything at that point. That's why for Raptor Lake, they re-introduced DLVR. They were forced to.Yea I can believe Alderlake 9W having extra optimizations. But previous Y chips did too. You'd expect no change. So why did it change for 15-28?
Intel Xeon w7-3445 10C 20T 2.59GHz, 20 MiB L2, 52.5MiB L3
That is true..This model is actually 20 cores. It's from a virtual machine so it may just be configured to use 10 cores only.
Can we extrapolate the data and multiply the result by two?This model is actually 20 cores. It's from a virtual machine so it may just be configured to use 10 cores only.
My theory: when ADL taped out, the engineers knew they had a battery life regression. It was too late to do anything at that point. That's why for Raptor Lake, they re-introduced DLVR. They were forced to.
Good info here, even if the English is not perfect: https://www.world-today-news.com/th...ll-reduce-the-consumption-of-the-raptor-lake/
Remember this is not what Intel wants (hence why they didn't do DLVR post-Haswell). So, this December, I think you will have something positive to say about RPL-M's power frugality
(Intel, don't embarrass me, OKKKKKKKK????? )
Bear in mind you can have FiVR while also having DLVR should Intel and it's partners wish.
Page 357 - Discussion - Speculation: Zen 4 (EPYC 4 "Genoa", Ryzen 7000, etc.)
Page 357 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.forums.anandtech.com
Posted it there as it is more relevant to Zen 4.
Intel Sapphire Rapids-SP Xeon Platinum 8468 S2 96C/192T
Nettrix N/A - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a Nettrix N/A with an Intel Xeon Platinum 8468 processor.browser.geekbench.com
Pretty competitive with the 2x64 core Milan.
It's actually a pretty good score for that 2S System.Not with Genoa, however, which is definitely an issue.
It is, indeed.It's actually a pretty good score for that 2S System.
If we extrapolate the performance the 60C/120T(120C/240T 2S) system will yield about 93,5000 points which puts it right there the Highest Score delivered by Genoa...
But even Geekbench has it's limits for Thread Counts, the MT gains after 256T just takes a massive dive because Genoa should be delivering more than 170,000 Points(If we extrapolate the known performance of 64C Genoa)
No it's not but it's your free will to post.
Looking forward to your conclusion that Intel should implement adaptive clocking for awesome power savings under load. /sI was dreaming about mobile Zen 4 having FiVR and DLVR and how revolutionary it could be for battery life
Really don't get the logic behind snarky comments from you and IntelUser2000. My apologies for hurting your eyes (and brain) with my posts. Just put me on ignore and be done with it.Looking forward to your conclusion that Intel should implement adaptive clocking for awesome power savings under load. /s