620 to Iris Plus 940 isn't even the correct performance comparison. Iris Plus 640 is presumably the direct compare.
Intel Gen11 graphics might bring a serious performance uplift:
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-ice-lake-gen11-gt2,38673.html
View attachment 3664
Sure, but that is because we start from such a low base.
How much time will have passed between Gen11 and the last performance increase in Gen whatever that Intel had released.
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/12032524
Possible new Icelake result; although it's running on older version of Geekbench on 32-bit Android which is a little weird.
Possibly a Chromebook prototype?
The 64-bit should work I think.
I'm thinking it's a fake.True, there is an Android 64-bit version of GB4. No idea why they avoided that one.
Intel basically skipped Gen10. So we're going from Gen9.5 to Gen11. Pretty big leap.
I think Gen 10 was suppose to be one with CannonLake.
Correct. It went through design & testing but never saw commercial availability. For whatever reason, Intel couldn't get it to work.
Charlie said the yield of fully defect free Cannonlake was basically 0%. I don't know if I totally believe that but probably not too far off.
Shouldn't this be in the video section ?
Thats what the main video forum is for "everything"Well the Video section hasn't added an Intel subforum yet.
4266 MHz? Damn! Willow Cove for desktop is going to be interesting to say the least.http://ranker.sisoftware.net/show_s...e9d4e5c3ab96a385fdc0f1d7b2d7eadafc8fb28a&l=en
http://ranker.sisoftware.net/show_d...e9d4e5c3ab96a385fdc0f1d7b2d7eadafc8fb28a&l=en
Icelake Sample. Has an Iris Plus 940 (with 48 EUs) and the laptop has LPDDR4X 4266 Mhz memory.
4266 MHz? Damn! Willow Cove for desktop is going to be interesting to say the least.
LPDDR4X 4266 has been announced as of some months ago:
https://www.anandtech.com/show/13569/micron-kicks-off-mass-production-of-12-gb-lpddr4x-dram-chip
It's no surprise that Intel is supporting it.
Cannonlake supports LPDDR4X although only 2400 is supported. That might have been an artificial restriction however.
Icelake Xeon D
I don’t think so, pretty sure Hewitt Lake is still 14nm, unsure if it’s Skylake SP or Cascade Lake SP based.There's a name I haven't heard in awhile: Xeon D. Previous iterations have been pretty impressive for their generation.
Um, is this Hewitt Lake? Or something else?
Wow no turbo? Interesting. Not much there to see otherwise. How much longer does Intel want to/need to push out 14nm++ Pentiums and such? It is my understanding that they prioritized much of their 14nm++ wafer allocation to larger dice for more-expensive CPUs. It also seems like they've been able to do a 2c/4t chip on 10nm for awhile now, and that they might actually get some decent ones with working iGPUs by this July or so. You would think now would be the time for them to make the transition of their Pentium lineup to 10nm.
I don’t think so, pretty sure Hewitt Lake is still 14nm, unsure if it’s Skylake SP or Cascade Lake SP based.
Just put a clickable turbo button on the case and you're good to go.