As somebody renting an apartment living outside of the US, I can do precisely none of those things. Leaks and the accompanying reactions are one of the few things that can be done to distract from a mundane existence that's going nowhere fast.
Some of you are likely getting a bit too excitable at every leak. Do something else. Have the neighbors over for a cookout, remodel your bathroom or do a Diners Drive-ins and Dives tour instead. Chill and wait for products to be on shelves and bench-marked before you decide whether to love or hate it. Leaks are entertaining, I'll grant you that. I enjoy them too. I just don't give any seriousness to them.
Still... Do something else.As somebody renting an apartment living outside of the US, I can do precisely none of those things. Leaks and the accompanying reactions are one of the few things that can be done to distract from a mundane existence that's going nowhere fast.
With this latency?!?!Still... Do something else.
With this latency?!?!
I'd gladly take you as my fortune cookie.I feel like a fortune cookie.
GPU Benchmark - Ashes of the Singularity
Video Card GPU Benchmarks, High quality testing of your video card and gaming system.www.ashesofthesingularity.com
12900K Ashes benchmark result. Tough to compare to other results but the score is very good.
Have to wonder if anything is overclocked. That is a fantastic score. My system can't touch it.
It's using a new benchmark version from September 9th that increased the number of used cores from 8 to 16.
("Cores simultaneously interacting with the GPU")
I guess we'll find out.
He's baaaack! Cringe post, mate. I think only you, the 5900x and 5950x are not too enthused about software of any kind getting an update to take advantage of more threads now that Intel is wielding 16 'fake' cores on the desktop. Wait. I think you're alone in this rabbit hole.This only make sense for the 12900K. Money talks...
Should have increased to 12 cores or 32 threads then to not seem this deliberately fitting for Intel's new gen.I really have to laugh at these two thinking AotS devs of all people are paid off by Intel.
Should have increased to 12 cores or 32 threads then to not seem this deliberately fitting for Intel's new gen.
You're assuming throwing more cores at driver submission threads always increases performance. We already see that 16T barely increases performance over 8T. 24 threads trying to queue could very well decrease performance relative to 16T or even 8T.
Or, 32 cores, 64 threads. LolThis word salad did not answer the question.
Why not 12C/24T or 16C/32T?
God forbid that a developer goes to lengths to make their software more performant at the same time Intel gets ready to launch a more competitive processor! God forbid that such an update benefits AMD processors as well.
Or, 32 cores, 64 threads. Lol
By waving a magic wand, you reckon? This exactly the scenario enthusiasts wanted to see; Intel and AMD release the hardware, and the software plays catch up. I suppose no one dropped the memo on how long it was gonna take. All this over one benchmark. I think a lot of y'alls prediction about Intel hardware is about to be trashed so we're back to accusations of rigging.Gee, they coulda made their software more performant back in 2019. I've had 24 threads since then. Lots of us have.
Gee, they coulda made their software more performant back in 2019. I've had 24 threads since then. Lots of us have.
Nobody is assuming anything here (except that you assume I do). This thread is actually already filled with remarks that the AotS benchmark is barely useful for anything. Doesn't change the fact that raising the amount of cores to 16 and threads to 24 at the same time is completely arbitrary and off-balance if it weren't for Intel's upcoming gen which "incidentally" perfectly matches that configuration.You're assuming throwing more cores at driver submission threads always increases performance.
You forgot: "Competition is good for the consumer." lolzNo sane person should try to argue away a lead this large. ADL will be much better than RKL. About time too, I'd say.