Intel GMA950

[Alaa]

what's the equivalent GPU (performance) to Intel GMA950 from ATi or Nvidia?

 

[aznrice54]

I don't think they get that bad.

 

[BFG10K]

Performance is terrible - integrated X300 and 6200 solutions are 2-4 times the speed.

 

[Pabster]

Yeah GMA950 is definitely not for gaming. But, to be fair, none of the integrated options are.

As noted even a basic card like an X300 would be considerably faster.

 

[Schadenfroh]

Nvidia equivalent would probably be a TnT2 Ultra.

 

[WT]

Dunno, an S3 Virge with good cooling might catch it depending on the game played

*wink*

 

[anandtechrocks]

Here you go:

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2427&p=2

 

[Acanthus]

It plays 3 year old + games alright, i managed to swing civ4 at minimum settings, no problems with warcraft 3 or tft.

Its ok for light gaming.

 

[Acanthus]

Originally posted by: anandtechrocks
Here you go:

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2427&p=2

You simply dont run high settings on something that low end.

 

[BFG10K]

High settings? They ran at 800x600 with no AF or AA.

 

[LLoose]

Its in no way a gaming card. I have one in my laptop and it is enough to run windows nicely.. which is what it was designed for.

 

[Acanthus]

Originally posted by: BFG10K
High settings? They ran at 800x600 with no AF or AA.

With high settings...

You can run 1024x768 with lower in game settings.

Youre an AF and AA whore BFG i know

But not everyone considers the other quality settings "must have".

Especially with a 50 cent graphics chip.

 

[BFG10K]

With high settings...

That's the label on the graphs which is true. However in the comments above they have:

Really, integrated hardware at low quality and 640x480 is still not acceptable.

 

[moonboy403]

performance of intel integrated solution?!

There's only one word to describe it: CRAP

 

[K121 Widowmaker]

Dun Dun Dun....INTEL SUCKS.

However, my 82865G Integrated can run older games. Settings maxed, but lower res.

Halo: 1024x768 @ 25-30 FPS
BF1942 1024x760 @ 25 FPS, 10-15 in cities.
BF Vietnam 640x480 @ 20 FPS

THose are all 2002-2003 games so yeah. But that will all change with my new X1300 hehehe.

 

[DeathReborn]

Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Nvidia equivalent would probably be a TnT2 Ultra.

I'd have said FX 5200 but you're probably right, lol.

 

[jiffylube1024]

Hey hey now, at least it will run Aero Glass (I think ).

 

[Acanthus]

Originally posted by: BFG10K

With high settings...

That's the label on the graphs which is true. However in the comments above they have:

Really, integrated hardware at low quality and 640x480 is still not acceptable.

It really depends on the title and the age of the game, you wont be playing 2005-2006 titles on it, ill agree.

But i run tons of older games on my E1505, and like i said, even civ4.

 

[Pabster]

Originally posted by: Acanthus
Especially with a 50 cent graphics chip.

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Now let us be fair. I believe it might be a dollar GPU!

 

[LOUISSSSS]

my laptop with a P-M and intel GMA 850 plays cs1.6 at 100fps stable at 1280x786(or 768)? max settings

i dunno if thats saying much tho

 

[IntelUser2000]

Nvidia equivalent would probably be a TnT2 Ultra.

Well... not exactly as GMA950 has better support for latest games plus it performs better.

TNT2 Ultra equivalent would be the first generation Intel, the 845G, or 845GE.

To put integrated graphics in summary: NONE of the integrated solutions even match X300SE. X300SE like a Radeon 9600 non-pro except with 64-bit memory.

 

[hans007]

the gma950, is i think just barely in the force fx5200 range of graphics.

the x300se is pretty slow. a geforce 6150 might be able tto match it with dual channel ram (sinc ethe se only has 64bit)