Would you prefer if he had treated him like a loser? He didn't look down on him, the guy asked the PM about business, so the PM took that as a conversation starter and asked him about business. The guy said he was homeless, but then said he'd like to get into business and finance but had survive christmas first Just because someone's homeless doesn't mean they have no skill, talent or dreams beyond getting fed in a soup kitchen. His treatment of the guy was actually very good, in contrast to those who tried to belittle the PM and by implication the homeless person he had a chat with.
I would prefer the PM remembered where he was and proceeded to interact with more tact, which is the opposite of treating him like a loser. He's supposed to have the social and diplomatic skills to handle that, just like you're supposed to recognize a Freudian slip when you see one. Also, I don't need your help to understand the other person in that video has skills, talents or dreams. I did not question his character, the criticism aimed at the PM was based on the relative situation of both men at the time of the video recording. They were in a
soup kitchen, people going there are facing a difficult time, no matter their potential.
Go back and listen to their conversation, how the other man asks the PM something like "are you coming out?", then remarks that it's good for business, as in good for his public image. The soup kitchen is noisy and the PM doesn't hear everything properly, only the "business" part is perfectly clear. So he proceeds to almost ask "Oh, do you have a business?" but he stops mid-sentence and corrects to something he deems more appropriate "Do you work in business?".
Now go back to the question he almost asked. Reconsider the context.