They have made their IP a lot more portable by the looks of it Intel Product is going to dual source like no other 🤣
They have made their IP a lot more portable by the looks of it Intel Product is going to dual source like no other 🤣The PTL Celestial iGP 12 Xe³ iGP tile is fabbed on N3E. So it make sense that the dGP silicon is also fabbed there.
Granted, Celestial is also fabbed on Intel 3. So we might have a surprise on low-end dGP silicon given the IP is there already.
Bob Swan was brought to stabilize the company and ready for the real leader, which happened to be Pat Gelsinger.You sure about N3E/P for celestial ? Looks like druid it is than Brian Kranzich and Paul otellni has to be the worst Intel CEOs It was paul who declined apple for their Fabs look at them now also the stagnation i guess Bob swan fired due to TSMC Capacity he bought but he made the right decision at the time it will take like H2 25 to see wether they succeed or not in FAB space
Bob Swan was brought to stabilize the company and ready for the real leader, which happened to be Pat Gelsinger.
But he did stabilize the company, enough for them to release Icelake. During BK's time the releases nearly entirely halted. The "Fall Guy" for 10nm is the guy that created the problem in the first place - Brian Kraznich. It's not like it was a secret that BK was bad.You mean "Be the Fall Guy for 10 nm"... and he got (IIRC) 20 million for it.
No. But late 2024 for 20 Xe part and Mid 2025 for 32 Xe.Is there a release date confirmed for any Battlemage card? The sooner the better.
So EVGA maybe for Intel GPU's? AMD already has good partners with Power Color and Sapphire.
NV wants exclusivity with their existing board partners. No BattleMage for you!
EGVA is dead. ASRock will make battlemage cards.So EVGA maybe for Intel GPU's? AMD already has good partners with Power Color and Sapphire.
Also this news is more than a year old and has been known for awhile.NV wants exclusivity with their existing board partners. No BattleMage for you!
Acer, too.ASRock will make battlemage cards.
The forced way of doing things crumble when the alternative is way better than expected by the dictator.So EVGA maybe for Intel GPU's? AMD already has good partners with Power Color and Sapphire.
My point was that EVGA left the GPU market because of how Nvidia treated them. EVGA has always made high quality graphics cards. Back in the day, their super clocked cards one every benchmark against the same cards of competitors. I am pulling for both Intel and AMD in the GPU market.The forced way of doing things crumble when the alternative is way better than expected by the dictator.
If Intel maintains good relationships and their product is good enough then Nvidia won't be able to do much about it.
Nvidia does try when the competition heats up and when the competition doesn’t they price gorge.My point was that EVGA left the GPU market because of how Nvidia treated them. EVGA has always made high quality graphics cards. Back in the day, their super clocked cards one every benchmark against the same cards of competitors. I am pulling for both Intel and AMD in the GPU market.
It would be nice if EVGA could return, producing both AMD and Intel cards.My point was that EVGA left the GPU market because of how Nvidia treated them. EVGA has always made high quality graphics cards. Back in the day, their super clocked cards one every benchmark against the same cards of competitors. I am pulling for both Intel and AMD in the GPU market.
Yeah they could have simply swapped off to new tile what is the point of Tiles if they can't do thatMid 2025 for the G31 variant? Half a year later Xe3 is coming in PTL. This is so odd. Even more odd that ARL-H next year is getting the old Alchemist, what a failure.
Time will tell but if LNL demo is to go by it seems better than alchemist situationGamers Nexus also thinks battle mage has to compete on price. I hope if the MSRPs are bad, that at worst they clear out the super loyal customers first ala AMD, then drop prices to be attractive enough to everyone else remotely interested. Can they afford to do it is the big question.
There's no way it's that much faster. Arrowlake-H uses ACM+ with XMX integration and more caches. At best we're looking at 20% over the predecessor, nevermind a dGPU A370M.ARL-H igpu or dgpu its ~60% faster then arc 370m
So its xe_lpg+ (acm+) or gimped xe2 dgpu with fused off cores. There is also another slightly faster bench with +100mhz
Details for Result ID Intel(R) Graphics (1152S 128C SM3.0 2.25GHz, 8MB L2, 16.5GB) (OpenCL)
ranker.sisoftware.co.uk
Doesn't A370M runs at very low clocks? (Circa 1.X GHz). ACM+ has double the cache and higher clocks. I could see it surpassing the A370M quite fairly.There's no way it's that much faster. Arrowlake-H uses ACM+ with XMX integration and more caches. At best we're looking at 20% over the predecessor, nevermind a dGPU A370M.
Why would doubling the cache improve performance significantly? The caches are very small for a graphics workload. Doubling won't do much. Also a dGPU has an inherent advantage of having more stable clocks due to a separate power budget and a dedicated memory that won't be under contention.Doesn't A370M runs at very low clocks? (Circa 1.X GHz). ACM+ has double the cache and higher clocks. I could see it surpassing the A370M quite fairly.
Doubling the cache can alleviate performance issues in some scenario Cache did wonders for Ada architectureWhy would doubling the cache improve performance significantly? The caches are very small for a graphics workload. Doubling won't do much. Also a dGPU has an inherent advantage of having more stable clocks due to a separate power budget and a dedicated memory that won't be under contention.
You shouldn't base performance on Sisoft tests. It is interesting for academic discussions but they've been laughed off as a benchmark for 30-plus years.