Works perfectly on my OG Zen 1700 in an Asrock AB350M-Pro4. I think it's more a question of which AGESA version you run, then what board you run.
Works perfectly on my OG Zen 1700 in an Asrock AB350M-Pro4. I think it's more a question of which AGESA version you run, then what board you run.Many B350 boards support it with latest bios. They claim you need Zen 2 or newer CPU/APU but I and others have used it with Zen+ on 3 series boards. I had it working with a 2600.
Thanks for confirming. Now upgrade that CPU!Works perfectly on my OG Zen 1700 in an Asrock AB350M-Pro4.
My 8600k+z370 has it with a beta bios. How well it would work with an Arc gpu, is beyond me.Still needs ReBAR.
Is that supported primarily by 10th-gen and newer, and AM4/AM5? Does B350 support it?
Write to Intel. They might gift you one for a review seeing your channel contentI would gladly test, if someone gifted me an Arc. xD
Oh you are too kind. The channel is an amateur one though, with minimal effort, just for fun.Write to Intel. They might gift you one for a review seeing your channel content
Try anyway. You got nothing to lose!Oh you are too kind. The channel is an amateur one though, with minimal effort, just for fun.
Nah, it's good as is. I'll replace both the mainboard and CPU when I upgrade.Thanks for confirming. Now upgrade that CPU!
Intel probably has to continue, because it seems likely that the lower tiers will start moving to multi-die APUs, in particular laptops, which are an increasingly important market. And there is a lot of money in professional products with GPU engines.Seeing the problems that AMD is having (not to mention Intel's layoffs), it's looking even worse if Intel is serious about continuing with the gaming GPUs.
Yeah, and to play at 1080p. They're so obsessed with their marketing rules that even their "real-world" content is disconnected from consumer reality.The message seems to be, if you buy a 4090, get our 13900K!
Would you prefer if he had treated him like a loser? He didn't look down on him, the guy asked the PM about business, so the PM took that as a conversation starter and asked him about business. The guy said he was homeless, but then said he'd like to get into business and finance but had survive christmas first Just because someone's homeless doesn't mean they have no skill, talent or dreams beyond getting fed in a soup kitchen. His treatment of the guy was actually very good, in contrast to those who tried to belittle the PM and by implication the homeless person he had a chat with.It reminds me of this scene from a soup kitchen where the PM of UK asks a homeless person if they work in business.
Would you prefer if he had treated him like a loser? He didn't look down on him, the guy asked the PM about business, so the PM took that as a conversation starter and asked him about business. The guy said he was homeless, but then said he'd like to get into business and finance but had survive christmas first Just because someone's homeless doesn't mean they have no skill, talent or dreams beyond getting fed in a soup kitchen. His treatment of the guy was actually very good, in contrast to those who tried to belittle the PM and by implication the homeless person he had a chat with.
I would prefer the PM remembered where he was and proceeded to interact with more tact, which is the opposite of treating him like a loser. He's supposed to have the social and diplomatic skills to handle that, just like you're supposed to recognize a Freudian slip when you see one. Also, I don't need your help to understand the other person in that video has skills, talents or dreams. I did not question his character, the criticism aimed at the PM was based on the relative situation of both men at the time of the video recording. They were in a soup kitchen, people going there are facing a difficult time, no matter their potential.Would you prefer if he had treated him like a loser? He didn't look down on him, the guy asked the PM about business, so the PM took that as a conversation starter and asked him about business. The guy said he was homeless, but then said he'd like to get into business and finance but had survive christmas first Just because someone's homeless doesn't mean they have no skill, talent or dreams beyond getting fed in a soup kitchen. His treatment of the guy was actually very good, in contrast to those who tried to belittle the PM and by implication the homeless person he had a chat with.
Looks basic & competentSparkle is back. I must have used dozens of their PSUs back in the skt A, skt 754, skt 939 days for client builds. They were cheap and reliable. I can't remember if I used any of their GPUs or not.
The Titan A750 is pimptastic.
https://www.newegg.com/Sparkle-Computer-Co-Ltd-GPUs-Video-Graphics-Cards/BrandSubCat/ID-129438-48
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you. That card's a beauty.Looks basic & competent
That’s the point, I much prefer simple & efficient designs. I see no beauty in a video card that looks like a light saber or Optimus Prime. That stuff is silly.If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you. That card's a beauty.
At those prices they lose even more money. They basically just have to set the price so the stock they've already made last until Battlemage, which will hopefully perform better relative to the production cost.Now is the time for Intel to strike with a firm blow to AMD and Nvidia. Arc A750 for $149 and Arc A770 for $199. The A770 with 16GB of Vram would be a direct shot at the 4060 cards.
But they gain market share. They establish a GPU brand for themselves. You have to look at the long term goal rather than short term setbacks. The Arc GPU's were more than a year late to begin with.At those prices they lose even more money. They basically just have to set the price so the stock they've already made last until Battlemage, which will hopefully perform better relative to the production
And they remove margin from competitors. However I agree the prices you suggested are likely too aggressive vs stock on hand. Love to see it happen.But they gain market share. They establish a GPU brand for themselves. You have to look at the long term goal rather than short term setbacks. The Arc GPU's were more than a year late to begin with.
That just looks silly imo.We don't need no...
View attachment 80899View attachment 80900
no Prime, we don't need no Optimus Prime!