I may get one too. I have so many older games I want to test, I haven't seen on any list yet. But this entry level one, don't care about higher performance tiers at the moment.
I may get one too. I have so many older games I want to test, I haven't seen on any list yet. But this entry level one, don't care about higher performance tiers at the moment.I am not a loyal customer (no Intel CPUs in my household), but I may purchase the top model just to own a small piece of history, and also to play with.
I may get one too. I have so many older games I want to test, I haven't seen on any list yet. But this entry level one, don't care about higher performance tiers at the moment.
Someone posted results about that, somewhere in this long thread. It is excellent at HTPC duty, AV1 included.Would you guys share how video encoding with AV1? Would be very interested in this.
Intel Arc A770 Shown off in Case Modder Video | Tom's Hardware (tomshardware.com)Did Intel disclose the thickness and length of the first party A770?
Costco has a laptop with an A370 inside. Have I missed something? I have heard nothing about the A370.
75W board power, yet it sports an 8-pin power connector, on the ASRock Challenger board? Not sure I'm happy about that.Intel Arc Graphics A380: Compelling For Open-Source Enthusiasts & Developers At ~$139 Review - Phoronix
He considers it great value for the Linux folks.
75W board power, yet it sports an 8-pin power connector, on the ASRock Challenger board? Not sure I'm happy about that.
Their Vulkan driver seems to work pretty well but OpenGL driver has a lot of overhead.Intel Arc Graphics A380: Compelling For Open-Source Enthusiasts & Developers At ~$139 Review - Phoronix
He considers it great value for the Linux folks.
Sounds like Intel is measuring their GPUs the same way they measure their CPUs. Where a 125W 12700K will routinely use well over 200W.
I have seen plenty of small GPU's use an additional 6pin, for a total of 150W. But to use an 8pin makes me question just how much it will actually use.
Did you check some A380 reviews? You should. The Gunnir has a TBP of slightly over 90W. The Challenger has a 10W lower GPU power limit, TBP should be lower.
Cards with 8 pin look more powerful.Yeah, I saw reviews of the A380. But why put an 8 pin on it, if your target audience (OEM machines) most likely only has 6pin power connectors?
A380 power can be tweaked with a absolute max of 800W PL4, PL1 & 2 at 298W & 395W respectively. Realistically it's sub 100W with Intel's own driver software, still a 6 pin would be more appropriate.
Intel Arc A380 GPU pushed to 3.1GHz, overclocker says it's complicated
Intel Arc A380 graphics card exteme overclocking is 'complicated' says overclocker, as overclocking isn't easy... had to analyze driver code instead.www.tweaktown.com
Intel giving signals they are in it for the long haul:
Intel says it's fully committed to discrete graphics as it shifts focus onto next-gen GPUs
Good to hear. As of right now my only interest in ARC is for PLEX because of their excellent decoder/encoder support. I'm irked by nvidia artificially limiting number of transcode streams to only three on top of skimping on memory on its cards. It would be nice to have real competition there. Still unsure how well Intel will fare on gaming front, but more competition is always good.Intel giving signals they are in it for the long haul:
Intel says it's fully committed to discrete graphics as it shifts focus onto next-gen GPUs
Well the Newegg reviews are about what you'd expect for the A380. The guy testing in the 6th gen can suck it. No one cares about that edge lord.
The review with the pictures feels like a compensated review IMO. And providing a Time Spy score of all things, really set off the Spidey sense. And what? you test with 3DMark but won't shell out $5 for it on a Steam sale?
Please note: If the driver has been installed under OS, please DO NOT shutting down or restart immediately after booting, because Intel graphics driver might access the flash memory of graphics cards when entering OS.