Exist said that. And it's not Spring. He said firmly middle of the year.
Not really. With a 2 year cycle it's a 2027 GPU. They need Xe4 if they want to have any chance of being competitive.
Exist said that. And it's not Spring. He said firmly middle of the year.Half a year?! Where did you see that G31 is only coming in Spring/Summer of 2025?
Not really. With a 2 year cycle it's a 2027 GPU. They need Xe4 if they want to have any chance of being competitive.Means they are getting serious about performance.
Hopefully that's worst case scenario.Not really. With a 2 year cycle it's a 2027 GPU.
That is precisely what's happening it has dedicated Vram and more resources to access to comparison to MTL made more senseLNL Xe2 ~2.05 Ghz vs Xe HPG A380 ~2.05 Ghz compared in a few games: https://www.pcgameshardware.de/Inte...-Preview-Xe-2-GPU-vs-Xe-1-Benchmarks-1459775/
A380 has much higher bandwidth which might distort some of the results.
That is precisely what's happening it has dedicated Vram and more resources to access to comparison to MTL made more sense
iGPU beating a previous gen dGPU with almost similar specs.LNL Xe2 ~2.05 Ghz vs Xe HPG A380 ~2.05 Ghz compared in a few games: https://www.pcgameshardware.de/Inte...-Preview-Xe-2-GPU-vs-Xe-1-Benchmarks-1459775/
A380 has much higher bandwidth which might distort some of the results.
Yeah 12GB is good enough for the target resolution and Intel can sell theirThe first shipments of B580 should sell out quickly. The only competition is the 7600XT 16GB which is going for $280 for the holiday weekend on the Gigabyte model and backordered until January. I'd expect that will be where some models settle in once B580 is available. B should be faster, and wins upscaling and ray tracing; important marketing points. The only marketing point for AMD is the extra vram, and it isn't going to matter at playable resolutions.
Good point on frame generation. You have to tick every box Nvidia has.Yeah 12GB is good enough for the target resolution and Intel can sell theirAIXMX i hope we get ExtraSS Frame Gen
And first affordable PCIe 5.0 card. Will look good on paper to most people.B should be faster, and wins upscaling and ray tracing; important marketing points.
$150 dollars?
The only marketing point for AMD is the extra vram, and it isn't going to matter at playable resolutions.
While it has some limitations like only working in windowed or borderless mode, the lossless scaling app is on sale for $5 on Steam. Intel owners can use it until an inhouse solution is available.AFMF is pretty impressive at times, in my opinion.
I'm not sure how important that is. They have a lot to fix on Alchemist. We know the gap between synthetic and games are mostly addressed. We know the utilization is better, and engines that use Execution Indirect will perform better, among other small changes. We know Day 0 compatibility is going to be better too.Good point on frame generation. You have to tick every box Nvidia has.
I have doubts. Xe2 has 50% more RT units per shader but overall it performs 50% higher. Since RT takes up a fixed amount of compute time, it needs to be 50% faster just to make up for it.My question is this: For whichever RTX card the raster is fairly equivalent to, will it be the first to beat current RTX at ray tracing?
Let's wait to see real perfomance, because conflicting infoG21 == 4060 ??
Let's wait to see real perfomance, because conflicting info
| Chip | Synthetics | Gaming |
| G31 | 4070s | RX6800 to RX6900XT |
| G21 | 4060ti | RX6600XT to RX6750XT |
| G10 | ?? | ?? |
So that mean N44 would be faster? Because i've noticed in synth test Intel always faster, than in gaming(G10 scrapped)