tviceman
Diamond Member
It's not rocket science, each generation the card prices is hiked over the previous gen.
And, more importantly, they have also increased their discrete market share.
It's not rocket science, each generation the card prices is hiked over the previous gen.
If Intel really wanted to break into the GPU card business, they could intentionally block mining on their cards, and even if they aren't technically as good as AMDs/NVidias, they have much better real world price/performance and availability because of that.
Then Intel would gain lots of mind/market share among gamers, and more reason for developers to optimize for Intel GPUs...
Still don't think it's going to end well unless they have a scalable design ready to go with Gen12.
You mean a second?I sure hope they fire a shot across the bow of NV/AMD and get a third competitor into the market.
You mean a second?
/runs
I still think PowerVR could come back to the dedicated market, especially with their previous work in dedicated ray tracing IP blocks.
The Atom chips with PowerVR graphics apparently had terrible drivers for Windows. They'd need to significantly improve their software to compete.
And the the drivers were nonexistent for the BSDs and Linux.The Atom chips with PowerVR graphics apparently had terrible drivers for Windows. They'd need to significantly improve their software to compete.
AMD Marketing Guru Darren McPhee joins Intel's Discrete Graphics Team
https://www.overclock3d.net/news/gp...mcphee_joins_intel_s_discrete_graphics_team/1
Gregory Stoner left AMD for Intel also
https://twitter.com/angstroms/status/1056887553859706880?s=21
AFAICT he was a big developer/contributor to AMDs ROCm
Like rats leaving a sinking ship?
He could be talking specifically about RTGHave you been in a time stop or something? AMD's financial woes are long gone. It's more like Intel is throwing money at anyone they can to try to build a ship.
He could be talking specifically about RTG