I quoted my post, why don't you read it?
Yes, it's not that good and Intel is better for the regular user but Bulldozer is far from being a fail, dud, shitty, crap, slow, turd, etc etc.
Actually if you take into account the fact that they moved to a new process AND a completely new architecture simultaneously, the Bulldozer is quite an accomplishment. The next ones will be better, in the meantime nobody is forced to buy. Let's see Intel try that and do better.
A small number of enthusiasts who have wet dreams with the IPC, single threaded performance and useless synthetic benchmarks filled the Internet (including the major social sites) with such pejoratives about the Bulldozer and here's the result.
The same people blasted the Thuban a while ago and for the same reasons (slower than the X4, etc). Now they claim that the Thuban is not so bad.
BTW, for the regular user the IPC and single threaded performance is sufficient since the days of the C2D and C2Q.