Pretty sure Core M is GT2.
Ian Cutress, Ph.D, the CPU editor of Anandtech did an interview on a twit show called The New Screensavers about the Skylake cpus and the new info we learned about them since IDF. Ian was on for about 20 minutes and I provided a link below at the exact spot the interview starts.
https://youtu.be/nHMwGYWOMGo?t=1660
For the people unfamiliar with TWIT, TWIT is an internet video and audio podcast network with like 2 dozen shows about technology and other entertainment and news fields. You can view twit shows on twit.tv, or you can subscribe and do automatic video or audio downloads, or you can watch them on youtube or ustream.
Well, Core M has HD 515. The 510 is GT1, right? It's also possible that the Pentiums that were meant to get GT1.5 got GT2 instead.
If Apple is quoting GFXBench Manhattan Offscreen for their 2x GPU performance claim then it's going to be an interesting match, HD Graphics 530 can deliver more than double A8X performance in this benchmark but Core M's HD Graphics 515 operates at lower clocks (up to 1GHz vs up to 1.15GHz) so it's going to be close but A9X probably has a slight advantage.
Definitely not ~40% if that's what you're hinting, also the best core m3 score atm is a tad higher ~New Core m3-6Y30 Geekbench score:
ST: 2485
MT: 4749
https://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/3404121
The first Windows 64-bit retail score for this chip is already better than the fastest submission of its predecessor.
Best Windows 64-bit Core M-5Y10c score:
ST: 2187
MT: 4554
This is a low-end Core M, the fastest Skylake-Y version operates at 40-45% higher Turbo clocks. Can't wait to see how the best Core m7-6Y75 retail implementations perform.
Definitely not ~40% if that's what you're hinting, also the best core m3 score atm is a tad higher ~
https://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/3404121
With win10 I expect it to cross 6K but only just ~
https://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/2637682
You edited the post after I quoted you :ninja:Same link as I provided, isn't it?
As for prototype, check the second score on the list ~ https://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/search?dir=desc&q=6Y30&sort=multicore_scoreThat's a prototype, if Core m3-6Y30 scores ~2500 points @ ST running at (up to) 2.2GHz then Core m7-6Y75 (up to 3.1GHz) will be a lot better than this pre-launch score suggests.
Unidentified Analyst
You talked a little bit about how within in Notebooks, if we add in 2-in-1s actually the volumes are growing. But as we look at the rollout of your new Core M product line and we think about 2-in-1s expanding their share within that Notebook space, what will that mean for your ASPs and ultimately for your revenues.
Kirk Skaugen - Senior VP and General Manager, Client Computing Group
Without going in to a ton of detail, there are two things we are doing on pricing for 2-in-1s. For certain screen sizes we compete and we give competitive discounting to go compete with premium tablets. So traditionally in the smaller size detachables that are kind of a tablet first usage model where the screen detaches, well give aggressive pricing.
But if we win business over for example an iPad where we dont have any silicon, thats all positive revenue to Intel because we didnt have that if its a conversion from an iPad over in a larger screen size, which is like a 13-15 inch conversion over our pricing is the same as it is on Core.
So its just a trade-off the OEMs are making, do they want a thinner fanless system versus a thicker fan system, but we dont have a difference in pricing there. So it will be the same --.
In United Emirates as well (USD 370), I just ordered mine today.i7 6600k and i7 6700k in stock here in Israel .
Its quite clear on the physics score. When computational work is in question, the A8X falls so far behind its Atom speed. Its only doing good when it can use its memory bandwidth and caches.
This is a significant milestone to improve the experience of playing HEVC video, especially at high resolutions like 4K. This experience is particularly improved on the newly released 6th Generation Intel Core processor family (“Skylake”, which uses the dedicated media processing capabilities of Intel Graphics Technology.
The 4th and 5th Generations Intel Core Processor families (“Haswell” and “Broadwell” offer a form of improved HEVC video playback through partial hardware acceleration support. However, the 6th Generation Intel processors offers full fixed-function decode through Intel® Quick Sync Video that offers high performance decode while also enabling the processor to complete other tasks, improving overall PC performance and responsiveness.
Platform Tested:
System Model: Skylake Client platform
Processor: Skylake 0.80GHz (4 CPUs), ~1.2GHz
Memory: 8192MB RAM
Graphics: Intel® HD Graphics 515
Graphics Driver Version: 10.18.15.4200
Operating System: Windows 10 Pro Insider Preview 64-bit
Do someone knows already if its possible to overclock via Base Clock Multiplier Locked Skylakes? What about non-Z Motherboards? A budget combo with a cheap Pentium and a mid range Motherboard (Low end Chipset with strong VRMs) could be a rather popular choice.
Thats really nice to see when I am waiting for a Skylake NUC for HTPC