@mikk
FYI, there's a mainboard BIOS update:
https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/25969/BIOS-Update-KYSKLi70-86A-
FYI, there's a mainboard BIOS update:
https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/25969/BIOS-Update-KYSKLi70-86A-
I doubt they did compare a much lower clocked 45W GT4 against a 65W desktop GT3 with much better thermal solution.
Actually Broadwell GT3e 65W is 10-30% off to a OC variant of GTX 750 in some newer games, so it's quite close to a default 750. GT4e 65W should beat this, probably even the OC variants.
Given that the 3dmark scores are lower than the scores from nucblog it is certainly not the best 3dmark11 score NUC6i7KYK can do. For you 3dmark may be all what matters, the real question how it performs in a game.
45W Iris Pro 6200 gets about 2800 points in 3DMark11, and 65W version gets 3000. Almost no difference.
2800 vs 3200 = nothing
Would end up at 3400-3500 with 65W.
And here we have a 3600 score.
http://www.ocstation.com/cpu-processors/intel-nuc-nuc6i7kyk-review/all
http://www.notebookcheck.com/Test-Acer-Aspire-V3-372-57CW-Subnotebook.165512.0.html
http://geizhals.de/acer-aspire-v3-372-57cw-schwarz-nx-g7bev-010-a1417406.html?hloc=at&hloc=de
i5-6267U with Iris 550 Graphics, 8GB Dualchannel, 256GB SSD, 13.3" 1920x1080 IPS for 719 is quite good. This device is configured as 35W says Notebookcheck, although from the Furmark+Prime95 load HWinfo screen CPU package doesn't draw over 27W.
They should explain how a 13"3 laptop with IGPU has 27W CPU power package while draining as much as 49.5W at the main and is throttling at 44.5W...
Could you read properly?
Given that the slowest 45W GT4e SKU is able to score 3600 and that a 65W version probably has a higher GPU Turbo than the slowest 45W GT4e SKU means, you are wrong.
i5-6267U with Iris 550 Graphics, 8GB Dualchannel, 256GB SSD, 13.3" 1920x1080 IPS for 719€ is quite good.
They should explain how a 13"3 laptop with IGPU has 27W CPU power package while draining as much as 49.5W at the main and is throttling at 44.5W...
The Stilt said:How wide is the eDRAM interface on Broadwell / Skylake and at what clocks the eDRAM runs at?
How wide is the eDRAM interface on Broadwell / Skylake and at what clocks the eDRAM runs at?
On AMD FX-8800P reference system with TDP & PPT set to 27W, the sustained power draw from the wall is 40.5W while the peak is 42.75W during P95 28.9 and Furmark :sneaky:
Meanwhile the battery I2C telemetry (running on battery power) shows discharge rate of 37.2W sustained and 38.8W peak.
Things are set in stone this close to release, so it doesn't matter whether or not Zen exceeds expectations.Kabylake is coming
Model has advanced to 142 and stepping to 9 from Skylake's 94/78 stepping 3.
There should be some process improvements but it still looks like ~0-5% better IPC. Intel not too worried by Zen? Well mobile not till next year for sure...
Things are set in stone this close to release, so it doesn't matter whether or not Zen exceeds expectations.
If it does, then Cannonlake would be Intel's opportunity to address it.
Desktop CannonLake may not even be a 2017 product.
So there would be a period where Kabylake is Intel's product up against Zen.
The desktop computing market as a whole has been subject to severe challenges over the last few years. The ultra-compact form-factor (UCFF) PC market that emerged with the introduction of the Intel NUCs (Next Unit of Computing) has been one of the few bright spots. PC gaming has been one of the few other markets that has withstood the overall issues. The small size of UCFF PCs usually made discrete GPUs difficult to integrate, and iGPUs have not impressed the gaming crowd. Therefore, the market has not seen many products targeting the gaming market while also being compact. This year, we have a new entrant in that category - Intel's Skull Canyon NUC, the NUC6i7KYK, places a 45W TDP Core i7-6770HQ with Iris Pro graphics in a chassis around twice the size of the standard NUC.