I see, so what will Kaby Lake X offer over S?
Better bins maybe.
I see, so what will Kaby Lake X offer over S?
I see, so what will Kaby Lake X offer over S?
So, you're "unimpressed" with Intel''s new budget tech, but you're suggesting gamers wait for a yet-unreleased AMD CPU, of which HOW MANY gaming benchmarks do we have of it?
At least the G4560 should be in the ballpark of the existing i3-6100 for gaming, which often compares favorably to a stock-speed 2500K.
Edit: Not that I'm saying get KBL over Zen, only that I personally don't have enough info on Zen to make a decision at this point.
Thanks for the answer but i see that 55 is the latest version, is there a 56 already?If the Brower supports it then it runs fine. For example Chromium 57 supports VP9 HW decoding, Chrome 55 didn't support it when I checked last time. Maybe Chrome 56.
The 5G OC Profile requires that you have the latest Z270 processor paired with an ASUS/ROG Z270 motherboard, the 80% success rate means you've got a pretty good chance of finally hitting that 5GHz mark.
Nah, he won't be impressed with Intel anything because he can get an awesome imaginary AMD chip at some imaginary price point he dictates in some imaginary release date in the future.
In the meantime, I will play with my new G4560 + H110 that together cost less than my daily wage.
Fine - its a nice cheap and plenty fast office cpu no discussion. For dgpu gamers i say wait 2 months. And for those with similar pay, consider to save an extra half days pay if thats what is needed to get a 4c 8t low end zen.
So you reckon they'll have the same success they had with NAND caching?We are too enthusiast focused to realize what Intel's goal with Optane Memory is. It's to offer SSD performance and responsiveness for cost constrained systems. The HDDs are still quite a bit cheaper than SSDs.
Regarding Optane Memory (not to be confused with Optane SSD).
It says 16/32/60/120/180GB for size. If that's "Optane Memory" Optane SSDs will probably end up in the 512GB-1TB range.
Also, working out as I expected. This is Z68's Smart Response perfected. With the caching setup faster than an SSD it's much more realistic to have HDD + Optane Memory combo end up like a standalone SSD. Also probably Intel hopes it works well because Optane is delayed likely due to yield issues and a tiny size device would work as a pipe cleaner before the big bang.
Now if it turns out well I'll probably go KBL Pentium or i3 with Optane + HDD.
We are too enthusiast focused to realize what Intel's goal with Optane Memory is. It's to offer SSD performance and responsiveness for cost constrained systems. The HDDs are still quite a bit cheaper than SSDs.
Intel's goal with Optane is to sell data center customers a mess o' DIMMs and make lots of $$$.
But the consumer stuff is neat, too
So you reckon they'll have the same success they had with NAND caching?
Ryzen SR3 will most definitely not have a similar cost to this $64 Pentium G4560 and the Raven Ridge APUs are only coming in H2-2017. Also this little 2C/4T is more than enough for a budget system with an entry/mainstream dGPU, not all people can or are willing to save money & wait months for a more powerful PC. There's plenty to choose from today as well, including new/used Core i5/i7, Xeon and even AMD parts.
Hmm, no native HDMI2.0 in KBL? No wonder ARK listed HDMI 1.4 resolutions.
MAJOR FAIL!
Guess it's a good thing that I picked up a pair of Club3D DP-to-HDMI2.0 active adapters, to use with my 40" 4K UHD HDR TVs.
Ofcource a G4560 walks all over anything amd have at that price segment if gaming with dgpu is the purpose.
I have explained why i think it doesnt fit the minimum requirement today for getting sufficient high min fps in new mp games using a dgpu. Because it imo defines the experience and compettitiveness. The games have changed and its only going one way and so then should the recommandations.
I dont think zen sucks or is slower than a quad hsw, but if it does or/and is to expensive then cheapest core i5 is imo the solution to minimal gaming with a dgpu.
We will know in a meager 2 months.
Well, it's HDMI 2.0a and those specs were only released in 2Q15. It adds HDR.The last slide in this post http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=threads/intel-skylake-kaby-lake-thread.2428363/page-349#post-38663062 (one page back) says HDMI 2.0 will be delivered via LSPCON. I'd love to know why Intel made that decision instead of having KL have native HDMI 2.0 support.
I see, so what will Kaby Lake X offer over S?