Not really, I already said about HSW power saving features. When software reads the core frequency the core needs to be active in order to do so. IOW when CPU-z is reading the frequency then bclk should not be in a power saving state. So the question remains. Why is it showing 24MHz?
A screenshot of SKL running 100MHz bclk would suffice to answer the question.
we need to take a 4 month time then wake up to even dream of any of this to happen
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/2776885
Does anyone have a trustable default 4790k result? Geekbench database results are all over the place.
Your result is x64. We need a x86 result.
Turbo enabled?
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/2780128?baseline=2776885
AES seems much improved. Some regression there as well, maybe caused by the clock deficit. Of course with only one 6700k result available this is a risk.
If you remove the memory score, the ST score is lower.Depending on turbomodes and what else.
But else its 5.6% MT and 7.1% ST clock for clock.
If 4.2 vs 4.4Ghz turbo its 11.2% ST.
They're higher cause of DDR4 I bet, it seems that Skylake refresh is the one to get, just like Devil's Canyon, unless of course one's in desperate need of itIf you remove the memory score, the ST score is lower.
They're higher cause of DDR4 I bet, it seems that Skylake refresh is the one to get just like Devil's Canyon unless of course one's in desperate need of it
Well, maybe the memory bandwidth will help igpu performance if anybody really cares on the desktop. Is mobile skylake DDR4 also?
If these are any indication of real world performance Skylake is shaping up to be pretty sad. Then again geekbench is a terrible measurement.