formulav8
Diamond Member
- Sep 18, 2000
- 7,004
- 522
- 126
1 out of 4 ain't bad!
Sorry, was pretty funny
Its true to some extent, at least right now. And people gave AMD the what for..;..
1 out of 4 ain't bad!
Sorry, was pretty funny
There was that Geekbench leak that Intel was testing fused-in LPDDR4X with Icelake that broke the memory latency test. Don't need edram if the system memory is that fast.
Yes that's system power, with GPU at idle. For comparison the Ryzen 1800X at stock during the same test was pulling around 200w system power. Overclocked the 1800X pulls an extra 60ish watts. The 7900X was pulling 150w extra. Crazy.That's 400W from the wall though, right, and for the entre system with GPU? That just doesn't seem like that much to me, especially when most people are running 650-1000W power supplies. I could very well be misinterpreting something though.
https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/3208482
Intel 0000 @ 3.19 GHz 1 processor, 6 cores, 12 threads
This is a Coffeelake 6/12 12MB entry on Geekbench.
Thanks for sharing, I like seeing these entries. Also means it indeed isn't that far off. Still hoping for higher clocks than these ES.
Intel has all the motivation and no alternatives but to succeed in clocking it higher than r5 1600x , so the end result should be that good.
I'm leaning towards a CFL 6c/12t instead of a SKL-X because I want more cores but better gaming than my current 6700K. Can't wait to see some benchmarks.
I think I am in the same boat. 14nm++ should offer another 10% increase in clocks so I think 4.5 GHz flat on 6C is definitely possible for Coffeelake. Ideal scenario would be 5 GHz on all cores.I am kinda hoping for a 4.5GHz boost on all cores with some room left for user improvements on those clocks. Should be doable @ 14nm++
Sounds right and unlikely that you will be disappointed when playing your games that know what to do with the additional two cores.
I think I am in the same boat. 14nm++ should offer another 10% increase in clocks so I think 4.5 GHz flat on 6C is definitely possible for Coffeelake. Ideal scenario would be 5 GHz on all cores.
In terms of future proofing, I think 6C may be the sweet spot for the next 5 years. 4C is already showing age and modern consoles really only use 6-7 cores during gaming (with 1-2 being dedicated for the OS and background tasks). 8C would definitely be a long term play but I think a modern 8C would be outdated by the time 8C becomes the new 4C.
I have a intriguing question. Anyone know the die size of i7 6770HQ, i7-7567U?
I think a couple ppl have, in the Skylake-X thread. They are still waiting on Motherboards.Has anyone bought Skylake-X cpu / x299 motherbaord yet?
I can see the CPUs are in stock here, but motherboards are on pre-order.
Naa. I find the price okey for bf1, that is the benchmark in this world . I could use a 7820 because of stellar perf but tdp is over the top for my closet usage with d15 and imo efficiency is a bit old school and a huge disapointment. 10/7nm is where it is for me aparently. But interesting non the less. Still looking how it pans out. Might go and undervolt the sklx a bit. Good times.1 out of 4 ain't bad!
Sorry, was pretty funny
Any benchmarks done for BF1 by these reviewers are useless though, as they just use the canned benchmark. However, any of these 6 core+ will be great for BF1. Even better than Ryzen with higher clock speed and lots of cores.Naa. I find the price okey for bf1, that is the benchmark in this world . I could use a 7820 because of stellar perf but tdp is over the top for my closet usage with d15 and imo efficiency is a bit old school and a huge disapointment. 10/7nm is where it is for me aparently. But interesting non the less. Still looking how it pans out. Might go and undervolt the sklx a bit. Good times.
New silicon takes much more time than MCM or EMIB does. Both the P4 and C2Q we're reactionary MCM solutions. You can come up with an MCM solution in a year. You have at least 2 year reset on any development if make major changes to silicon.
The 7800X comes clocked bellow 4Ghz in stock config (Intel needs their segmentation). I would hold complete judgement until reviewers have the time to overclock it as well and test gaming performance.It looks to me that skl-x is a ryzen style CPU. gaming performance is going up with cores as with ryzen but the baseline with 6C 7800X is just slower than 7700k, that is a dissapointment.
Ananadtech measured power draw under a different load, in Prime95 all SKL-X SKUs are bound to hit 140W and drop frequencies as much as needed to maintain the 140W TDP ceiling. You would see different power numbers in Prime 95 as well if all Skylake X SKUs would be compared at the same clock speed.One chart is inconsistent with what we have seen before, that is power draw
there is clear difference between 6C, 8C and 10C SKL-X, where AnandTech and others measured the same power draw
why is that?
BothAnd what is the representative value? prime or cinebench ?
Cinebench because unless you specify the Prime95 version number, there is no way of telling what level of AVX is being run.And what is the representative value? prime or cinebench ?
Does anyone have a public release date on the 3647 xeons?