I was part of the forum minority that defended KBL, but go on with your half-baked meme analysis.Yeah, 'cause Kaby Lake was such a failure
No. The memory controllers in the AMD setup are per CPU, so unless AMD designs a new platform that can use those memory controllers as well (basically either six or eight channel RAM), you won't see TR chips with 24-32 cores.
Videocard just had an article where leak of i3 specs don't have hyperthreading, i was right lol.
https://videocardz.com/71740/intel-core-i7-8700k-pictured-i3-8350-and-i3-8100-specs-leaked
I bet you there will be i5 SKUs that have 4C/8T.
So is August 21st the so called paper launch of Coffee Lake? When are the cpu and mobo going to be actually available to buy?
I was part of the forum minority that defended KBL, but go on with your half-baked meme analysis.
Same here about the fiction, and I probably added too much sarcasm and not enough actual info to get my message across.I'm getting a bit salty over the Skylake-X and Threadripper fiction being spread by some
A YouTube channel called ADBIG has a video with upcoming Acer Nitro AN515-31 notebook equipped with Intel Core i7-8550U processor. The notebook has quad-core CPU with eight threads, 20 GB of DDR4 memory and GeForce GTX graphics cards.
This is the first public appearance of 8th Gen Intel Core processor.
The laptop is expected to cost around 25,000 baht (752 USD).
You would be surprised how well a U processor like that one will be able to power something between GTX 1050 -> GTX 1060, especially if the OEM was smart enough to have it work at cTDP up (25W or whatever is the new norm on this gen).Though a gaming laptop (NVIDIA GeForce GTX) with a very power limited U processor?
Here is a webpage with lots of the low power Coffee Lake rumored chips.Possibilities in Coffee Lake (~ to indicate my prediction)...
Very interesting, although you may want to repeat testing and make sure it's a consistent drop in temps. If the two measurements are distant enough and short enough time wise, other factors can affect the outcome.Look at the difference lowering mesh voltage by .033v (still at 3200MHz) and turning down LLC one notch made in temps. All other setting are the same.
Good Idea. I saw a lesser drop (4c) when comparing before and after 2hr runs of Realbench. I'll probably run some shorter (1hr) back to back runs of a few different tests tomorrow.Very interesting, although you may want to repeat testing and make sure it's a consistent drop in temps. If the two measurements are distant enough and short enough time wise, other factors can affect the outcome.
VRM numbers are better as well.This is pretty surprising. Look at the difference lowering mesh voltage by .033v (still at 3200MHz) and turning down LLC one notch made in temps. All other setting are the same. As you can see, the core voltage is unchanged, and comparing the average and peak watts, they are almost identical ~1% lower. But look at those temps! Max and average both dropped by 7c. I really did not think the mesh voltage affected temps this much.
Before lowering LLC and Mesh...
After...
A couple of 7960Xs on HWBot are trolling all Threadripper WR attempts. Lmao!Core i9 7960X vs. Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
http://hwbot.org/benchmark/cinebench_-_r15/rankings?start=0#interval=20#cores=16#start=0
Yep, same number of cores, 9% better score with 4% higher clock speed and a paltry 70% higher price tag. It's a champA couple of 7960Xs on HWBot are trolling all Threadripper WR attempts. Lmao!
Yep, same number of cores, 9% better score with 4% higher clock speed and a paltry 70% higher price tag. It's a champ