Weird, wonder why the single thread is slower than the 7700K.
You didn't seem to read my comment properly. I've known about that since day one.RAM hasn't been connected to Intel chipsets since 2008.
DMI 3.0, or PCI Express 3.0 x4, has bandwidth ~4 GB/s per direction. Fine for most users, but not enough for multiple NVME drives.
Here's my 7820X @ 4.6GHz w/ mesh @ 3.2GHz:
It would seem that L2 cache bandwidth is much higher on the 7900X than it is on the 7820X. I wonder why that is...
They are very close.
What evidence? I haven't seen a single evidence. Or do you mean the KBL misread entries with CFL due to the KBL PCH? This is no evidence because we know that Z370 uses KBL PCH.
Is that was happened? It did look like same CFL samples were running on Z270.
Thanks.There is zero evidence that it run on a Z270 board.
These leaks seem to suggest that the 4.7 single core boost number might be incorrect.
Never been a problem for any other processor, why suddenly now? Sounds more like the 1 core turbo is more akin to XFR on ryzen than a traditional turbo state4.7GHz is the correct number. But don't assume that these benchmarks are actually running at that boost number. Very tricky to get single core boost speeds in an operating system where you have a lot of lightweight threads doing work all the time.
Well you have several options, IPC is higher or lower, or CR15 score is fake, or i7 8700K TurboCore is deliberately disabled. But for what reason, fake CR15 score that does not make much sense.These scores are not top military Aliens secrets, way fake CR15 Singlethread score if official tests are coming soon.
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=thread...s-out-page-554.2428363/page-607#post-39052497
Never been a problem for any other processor, why suddenly now? Sounds more like the 1 core turbo is more akin to XFR on ryzen than a traditional turbo state
So what's happening on the 7700K system then? I thought that 3 of these tested are Intel? I could write more but won't.Have you ever actually used an Intel processor? Try to "force" 1-core turbo to work, and you'll find that it's not as easy as you make it sound.
So what's happening on the 7700K system then? I thought that 3 of these tested are Intel? I could write more but won't.
Have you ever actually used an Intel processor? Try to "force" 1-core turbo to work, and you'll find that it's not as easy as you make it sound.
I think the single core turbo might be the same as the 7700K.@Arachnotronic,
Are you the lawyer of Intel or something?
I really don't understand the logic you present.
If one core Turbo is higher than the other I'd assume that for 1 core test it would have better performance.
The above holds for any other generation of Intel processor (If the architecture is the same and only boost turbo is higher).
It doesn't happen here, so either:
It seems you keep trying explaining Intel in very curvy ways.
- This is not the Turbo.
- Intel changed its Turbo definitions.
- The test isn't valid.
Starting to sounds similar to press officer on a press conference after a scandal.
Ahhh...but the 8700K supposedly has a dual core turbo of 4.6, which should still have it ahead of the 7700K with two cores boosting...So much ado about a hundred mhz or two and a few points in Benchmarks. People, the base clock on the 8700K is a lot lower than the 7700k. Seems a gross oversimplification to expect even a "single thread" task to run exclusively on one core of a six core processor. Plus there is variation from chip to chip. Personally, I would *expect* a six core chip with a 500 mhz lower base clock to be slightly slower in even a "single threaded" task than the 7700K. TBH, I really dont attach much weight to the turbo 3.0 or whatever intel calls that one thread turbo (same for the AMD equivalent). These IMO are very ideal situations, made mainly for marketing purposes, and probably wont ever be seen in real life.
And no, I am *not* a lawyer for intel, and have no financial interest in either Intel or AMD.
So much ado about a hundred mhz or two and a few points in Benchmarks. People, the base clock on the 8700K is a lot lower than the 7700k. Seems a gross oversimplification to expect even a "single thread" task to run exclusively on one core of a six core processor. Plus there is variation from chip to chip. Personally, I would *expect* a six core chip with a 500 mhz lower base clock to be slightly slower in even a "single threaded" task than the 7700K. TBH, I really dont attach much weight to the turbo 3.0 or whatever intel calls that one thread turbo (same for the AMD equivalent). These IMO are very ideal situations, made mainly for marketing purposes, and probably wont ever be seen in real life.
And no, I am *not* a lawyer for intel, and have no financial interest in either Intel or AMD.