StinkyPinky
Diamond Member
- Jul 6, 2002
- 6,874
- 1,053
- 126
One day fusion power will be discovered and then Intel wont care about TDP for the desktop. Say hello to 20GHz 1000W CPU's that doubles up as an incinerator.
Have fun waiting till 2060.One day fusion power will be discovered and then Intel wont care about TDP for the desktop. Say hello to 20GHz 1000W CPU's that doubles up as an incinerator.
One day fusion power will be discovered and then Intel wont care about TDP for the desktop. Say hello to 20GHz 1000W CPU's that doubles up as an incinerator.
I'm expecting:
-10-15% better performance
-Similar air overclock as Ivy Bridge
-Better top overclocks using exotic cooling(but this is due to other factors like increasing the max multiplier and giving different base clock frequencies)
what is power consumption
Who cares about power consumption.
My Macbook lasts 5-7 hours on Sandy and my Desktop runs at 4.0 ghz 24/7 and i dont care about power use there
Anything else is a bonus.
So, you didn't worry about power consumption from:I care about power consumption, because Ivy bridge mobile CPUs overheat, which doesn't just cause the laptop to be uncomfortable to use, it also means they get throttled and thus slower.
I care about power consumption, because Ivy bridge mobile CPUs overheat, which doesn't just cause the laptop to be uncomfortable to use, it also means they get throttled and thus slower.
The mobile Ivy Bridge processors are not affected by this issue because they do not use a heat spreader between the chip and cooling system.they overheat due to bad TIM and not because they use to much power lol
Also i have yet to see a laptop not get hot when under full load
The mobile Ivy Bridge processors are not affected by this issue because they do not use a heat spreader between the chip and cooling system.
Wow:No but i have never seen a laptop maker use good TIM in general. They cut costs during mass production.
So, you didn't worry about power consumption from:
Sandy Bridge mobile CPUs
Clarksfield CPUs
Penryn mobile CPUs
???
It seems to me that you are making Ivy Bridge a special point. Even though, Ivy Bridge has the lowest TDP/Power Consumption of all x86-64 CPUs on the market.
they overheat due to bad TIM and not because they use to much power lol
Also i have yet to see a laptop not get hot when under full load
Ivy Bridge - 35 Watt TDPWhy would I bring up older and even more power hungry CPUs?
Ivy Bridge - 35 Watt TDP
Sandy Bridge - 35 Watt TDP
Clarksfield - 35 Watt TDP
Penryn - 35 Watt TDP
What is the power consumption/TDP of each CPU generation?
Thirty-five watts.
The Retina Pro 15" uses discrete graphics which will help a great deal and I doubt that the 13" will play BF3 'with ease'.As far as i know Apples Retina Pro doesnt throttle under load. i have seen 2 people play 64 player BF3 on it with ease for sustained periods
The Retina Pro 15" uses discrete graphics which will help a great deal and I doubt that the 13" will play BF3 'with ease'.
I'm a bit baffled how so many people here seem to expect (or imply) performance per watt increases of 50% and more as well as an endless supply of magical beans if you'd ever need any. I'ts on the same process as IB after all.
But only barely in the case of http://www.anandtech.com/show/6194/asus-ux31a-putting-the-ultra-in-ultrabooks/8 for example.The GPU is irrelevant to my point. The CPU handles the 64 player aspects of BF3 and it doesnt throttle.
22nm FinFET isn't tuned for high clocks and Haswell will not bend physics.
One day fusion power will be discovered and then Intel wont care about TDP for the desktop. Say hello to 20GHz 1000W CPU's that doubles up as an incinerator.
Power use won't be the problem at that TDP, but how to cool that chip.
I care about power consumption, because Ivy bridge mobile CPUs overheat, which doesn't just cause the laptop to be uncomfortable to use, it also means they get throttled and thus slower.