well, i was referring to general comments such as the one i mentioned rather than pointing out people specifically.
i just find it obnoxious when people talk smack to others who can't afford or simply don't feel the need fpr bleeding edge performance, as if having a faster video card or processor makes them better people. while 'shurm' certainly doesn't have the fastest system available, it's still a well rounded system capable of doing anything that needs to be done, gaming or not - and while there's certainly ways it could be better, the top systems aren't THAT much better in a realworld scenario, especially when one considers many people are quite happy being able to run games well at 1024 with some aa/af.
and actually 512 runs most things just fine; there's only a few you will notice much improvement by going higher. i do believe that when it comes to memory, more is better (at least unitl you hit 1gb on desktops), but 512 doesn't really limit pc's all that much. in fact, i would recommend more memory for his apps moreso than i would any games he might play.
as for the 6600gt, it's not that bad of a card either.. iirc it's a bit faster than last gen's champ (9800pro/xt), or at least as fast, and should run most games very well at 1280 or 1024 with aa/af; i still have 2 systems which have 9800pro and they play the latest games just fine @ 1024 (doom3) and 1280 (most everything else).