Spencer278
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2002
- 3,637
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: Tommunist
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Just yesterday evolutionary theory had to be reformulated because of some fossil remains. Facts don't need to be readjusted continually.
Evolution is a theory. Creationism is a theory. Simply stating this in no way endorses one or the other. The judge, in this case, is being just another liberal activist judge.
Oh ya, I got a haircut a month ago and already my hair has evolved and now I need another cut!!!
1. you don't understand what a theory (in scientific terms) is
2. you don't understand what evolution encompases as you just demonstrated by trying to say that those fossil remains required that some part of evolution theory needed to be "reformulated"
Out of curiosity. Is there anything they could find that WOULD prove evolution wrong in your mind? Think about that and then think twice next time you feel like throwing around the word zealot.
To disprove evolution you would need to come up with something besides DNA as the basic blue print of cells. You would need a lossless way to copy data and DNA is not the medium. Or you would need to demostarte some outside force directing the changes in DNA, the only way to do that is prove the changes are not random. If you find either of the two I would be open to the idea that evolution is wrong.