Originally posted by: dirtboy
Originally posted by: Tuktuk
Dirtboy, I have to believe someone commiting so many logical fallacies in their argument has to be a troll. If you aren't, I encourage you to take Anthropology 101 at your local community college (or if you are in school already, take it there). You obviously are not familiar with evolutionary theory and I think it would open your eyes a little, if you are willing for them to be opened.
edit: No I'm not going to lay out the fossil record for you, except to say that the linear progression is proven with fossils. I'm not here to be a teacher, only to tell you that the knowledge exists and you can learn on your own.
I knew you'd give up. We've only begun and you can't prove yourself.
Let's look at the facts ape-man.
I ask you for a linear progression of fossils of anything, man, horse, something. You response... *silence* followed by, but Evolution is a fact!! *cries*
So I ask to prove yourself and you can't.
So your link stuff that says horses have evolved over a 55 million year period, but no substantial fossil records. I have studied the same classes as you, been to top museums unlike you, and never seen proof. But you say it's there. I have and will continue to prove you are completely 100% wrong. You're just too closed minded to realize it and you will fall back on your undieing faith in evolution.
So let's say horses started 55 million years ago, but your testimony is that they were around long before that.
Let's say there was only one horse then that reproduced asexually, also an inaccurate fact.
Let's say the horse population doubled every 10 years, even though they can reproduce much quicker.
So, 55 million years divided by 10 is 5.5 million years.
So we can use simple math to determine how many horses have lived and estimate the current population.
That is:
2^5,500,000 - 1
Wow. That's so many horses, every bit of land would be covered by them 3 high or more.
Since so many horses lived, acording to your "facts" and testimony, providing a linear progression of fossils showing their evolution would be simple. There should be so many horse bones around, I should trip over them. So where are all the fossils, where are all the horses and why can't you show this?
Too hard?
How about humans or ape-men, which you claim as fact but also was rebuked by science.
You sight 4,000,000 year old bone fragments.
Okay, first human started 4 million years ago.
Reproduced every 100 years.
That means, there should be 2^400,000 - 1 humans running around, with loads of fossil records over the
4,000,000 year span. But there's not fossil records or any proof of this either.
What did you professors spoon feed you as an excuse for this?!?
Call me a troll all you want. You all criticize other people for believing different than you, citing that you have abosulute unconditional scientific proof that evolution is FACT. You jump on those people claiming they are stupid blind believers. I ask you simply to prove it and you can't. Now you go running... typical losers of a debate. When you can't win, go cry to your professors who brain washed you. It is you who believe in blind faith of evolution.