Nope. IMO.
But no way it should be taken as a bible either.
This isn't anything ng like wtftech or MLID.
Or who knows? Lip-Bu Tan becomes CEO,
Charlie has more thoughts:
"The one name that the board was trying to get before they settled on Gelsinger is not going to leave her current company"
Lisa (in a meeting with her board): Hey, by the way, you don't mind if I go on a sabbatical for 4 years to fix Intel, do you?Lisa Su? lmao
She could do it on lunch breaks via e-mail.Lisa (in a meeting with her board): Hey, by the way, you don't mind if I go on a sabbatical for 4 years to fix Intel, do you?
And then Pat made everything much worse
"The stock lost more than 60% under his tenure"
MTL-S was abandoned due to unknown "issues" probably related to tiles latency. Then Meteor Lake itself wasn't that great and didn't claim the absolute performance crown against AMD's offerings. Knowing these things, why why why would Pat make the decision to let Arrow Lake continue on its lame trajectory? It's like he didn't care about Intel's core products and just kept obsessing over foundry. Maybe he thought the respective division heads would be held responsible for the products. Wasn't it his responsibility to have meetings with them after MTL-S and mobile MTL to try to figure out what went wrong and how to fix it as soon as possible? The bad cache latencies on Arrow Lake, that's an engineering problem and he being an engineer, should have prevented that from happening.if they continued with some MBA psycho instead of Pat, Intel would be absolutely sunken by now
Still lose to 9xxx3d in game,and waste 1b or more.MTL-S was abandoned due to unknown "issues" probably related to tiles latency. Then Meteor Lake itself wasn't that great and didn't claim the absolute performance crown against AMD's offerings. Knowing these things, why why why would Pat make the decision to let Arrow Lake continue on its lame trajectory? It's like he didn't care about Intel's core products and just kept obsessing over foundry. Maybe he thought the respective division heads would be held responsible for the products. Wasn't it his responsibility to have meetings with them after MTL-S and mobile MTL to try to figure out what went wrong and how to fix it as soon as possible? The bad cache latencies on Arrow Lake, that's an engineering problem and he being an engineer, should have prevented that from happening.
Defending Pat with excuses doesn't make sense to me. He was the top dog. He was responsible for everything. If he thought someone couldn't meet the expectations of the company, he should have replaced those people with more competent ones. All he cared instead was trying to make headlines with statements of questionable veracity. He did not take a hands-on approach to being a CEO. He did not care about the bad publicity from Raptor Lake degradation issues. Had he deigned to care about his customers and showed even a little concern at the sudden rise of people complaining about LGA1700 platform instability in late Dec 2023 to March 2024, maybe the whole fiasco could have been avoided.
This is probably a sarcastic post. Look at the size of those dies, lol. They are like 1mmx1mm. Yield will be drastically better vs a 10mmx10mm die, obviously.𝐼𝑎𝑛 𝐶𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 reports without citing any sources:
"Intel test chip yield on 18A is 99%. 🤷♂️"
View attachment 112777
The plot thickens.
why why why would Pat make the decision to let Arrow Lake continue on its lame trajectory? It's like he didn't care about Intel's core products and just kept obsessing over foundry.
Pretty sure Pat still has a vested interest in getting Intels stock price up. Wonder how many shares he still has...Looks like Pat has a lot of time on his hands, and is now correcting people who are wrong on the internet.
View attachment 112824
Good rest of the post but need to point out that Arrow Lake issues are not related to process AFAICT. N3B is more advanced than anything AMD is using.
Looks like Pat has a lot of time on his hands, and is now correcting people who are wrong on the internet.
View attachment 112824
No if that is factored in you've lost a bunch of money.Does that take inflation into account?
He's also correct here. Why act like he's always wrong? Weird.
Nah, it was probably Gelsinger that killed it. If any one person was responsible.Did Raja cancel that?
There's that renowned Intel arrogance again. He thought they could outsmart Nvidia with dedicated AI accelerators. Sigh. This is kinda like Larrabee all over again.Nah, it was probably Gelsinger that killed it. If any one person was responsible.
You should see the ads here in the states right now. They are trying to make you believe that your Intel powered device (most likely laptop as they show it) can do your job for you.There's that renowned Intel arrogance again. He thought they could outsmart Nvidia with dedicated AI accelerators. Sigh. This is kinda like Larrabee all over again.