Interesting tidbit about 9/11...

[CasioTech]

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: CasioTech

I never defended that theory, so again, you have no pertinent answers to my questions. :thumbsdown:

DUDE, WTF?! ---

Originally posted by: CasioTech

:thumbsup:

that's right, rich people like the Rockefeller's will kill any amount of people to make more money for themselves and their shitty own families.

then they will donate a million dollars and spend 10 million advertising it.

Originally posted by: CasioTech

of course he made off with billions, that's what happens when insurance pays you out.

what the hell is your point? I never said he caused it. I said he made money off collateral damage.

?@#@#$@?!!!?$

WTF DOES THIS STATEMENT YOU MADE MEAN THEN:

"that's right, rich people like the Rockefeller's will kill any amount of people to make more money for themselves and their shitty own families. "

I really cannot debate with you anymore, it's like talking to a 5 year old. At least the 5 year old might give up when he knows he's wrong.

What I said was, that rich people WILL kill for money but never accused silverstein of anything.


reading... comprehension...

 

[Ns1]

ok fuck this shit

Silverstein did it. I'm sure of it now. IBS has opened up my mother fucking eyes, he did it for the money.

So if Silverstein did it, how the fuck could the US government do it? They clearly did not have as much to gain as Silverstein.

Unless, Silverstein was working in conjunction with the US government....

 

[Josh]

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: CasioTech

I never defended that theory, so again, you have no pertinent answers to my questions. :thumbsdown:

DUDE, WTF?! ---

Originally posted by: CasioTech

:thumbsup:

that's right, rich people like the Rockefeller's will kill any amount of people to make more money for themselves and their shitty own families.

then they will donate a million dollars and spend 10 million advertising it.

Originally posted by: CasioTech

of course he made off with billions, that's what happens when insurance pays you out.

what the hell is your point? I never said he caused it. I said he made money off collateral damage.

?@#@#$@?!!!?$

WTF DOES THIS STATEMENT YOU MADE MEAN THEN:

"*******that's right*******, rich people like the Rockefeller's will kill any amount of people to make more money for themselves and their shitty own families. "

I really cannot debate with you anymore, it's like talking to a 5 year old. At least the 5 year old might give up when he knows he's wrong.

What I said was, that rich people WILL kill for money but never accused silverstein of anything.


reading... comprehension...

CasioTech, please, stop. You said "THAT'S RIGHT" in response to and quoting IcebergSlim's post about Silverstein. This would indicate to any person with a third-grade reading comprehension level that you were agreeing with his thoughts. You cannot dig yourself out of this hole.

 

[cheezy321]

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: CasioTech

I never defended that theory, so again, you have no pertinent answers to my questions. :thumbsdown:

DUDE, WTF?! ---

Originally posted by: CasioTech

:thumbsup:

that's right, rich people like the Rockefeller's will kill any amount of people to make more money for themselves and their shitty own families.

then they will donate a million dollars and spend 10 million advertising it.

Originally posted by: CasioTech

of course he made off with billions, that's what happens when insurance pays you out.

what the hell is your point? I never said he caused it. I said he made money off collateral damage.

?@#@#$@?!!!?$

WTF DOES THIS STATEMENT YOU MADE MEAN THEN:

"*******that's right*******, rich people like the Rockefeller's will kill any amount of people to make more money for themselves and their shitty own families. "

I really cannot debate with you anymore, it's like talking to a 5 year old. At least the 5 year old might give up when he knows he's wrong.

What I said was, that rich people WILL kill for money but never accused silverstein of anything.


reading... comprehension...

CasioTech, please, stop. You said "THAT'S RIGHT" in response to and quoting IcebergSlim's post about Silverstein. This would indicate to any person with a third-grade reading comprehension level that you were agreeing with his thoughts. You cannot dig yourself out of this hole.

It will be interesting to see him try, though.

 

[CasioTech]

Originally posted by: Ns1
ok fuck this shit

Silverstein did it. I'm sure of it now. IBS has opened up my mother fucking eyes, he did it for the money.

So if Silverstein did it, how the fuck could the US government do it? They clearly did not have as much to gain as Silverstein.

Unless, Silverstein was working in conjunction with the US government....

didn't someone write earlier that he lost the rights to some buildings? sounds like incentive to me!

I will keep saying that rich people will kill for money but will also keep saying I never said silverstein had anything to do with this incident, whether he killed others in the past for personal gain I don't dismiss but never said he had any involvement in 911

 

[MotF Bane]

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: CasioTech

I never defended that theory, so again, you have no pertinent answers to my questions. :thumbsdown:

DUDE, WTF?! ---

Originally posted by: CasioTech

:thumbsup:

that's right, rich people like the Rockefeller's will kill any amount of people to make more money for themselves and their shitty own families.

then they will donate a million dollars and spend 10 million advertising it.

Originally posted by: CasioTech

of course he made off with billions, that's what happens when insurance pays you out.

what the hell is your point? I never said he caused it. I said he made money off collateral damage.

?@#@#$@?!!!?$

WTF DOES THIS STATEMENT YOU MADE MEAN THEN:

"*******that's right*******, rich people like the Rockefeller's will kill any amount of people to make more money for themselves and their shitty own families. "

I really cannot debate with you anymore, it's like talking to a 5 year old. At least the 5 year old might give up when he knows he's wrong.

What I said was, that rich people WILL kill for money but never accused silverstein of anything.


reading... comprehension...

CasioTech, please, stop. You said "THAT'S RIGHT" in response to and quoting IcebergSlim's post about Silverstein. This would indicate to any person with a third-grade reading comprehension level that you were agreeing with his thoughts. You cannot dig yourself out of this hole.

He's digging for China right now. Although their super military probably has soldiers stationed underground to bring him to their leader, where he can provide information about what the U.S. government really does to its people.

 

[Ns1]

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: Ns1
ok fuck this shit

Silverstein did it. I'm sure of it now. IBS has opened up my mother fucking eyes, he did it for the money.

So if Silverstein did it, how the fuck could the US government do it? They clearly did not have as much to gain as Silverstein.

Unless, Silverstein was working in conjunction with the US government....

didn't someone write earlier that he lost the rights to some buildings? sounds like incentive to me!

I will keep saying that rich people will kill for money but will also keep saying I never said silverstein had anything to do with this incident, whether he killed others in the past for personal gain I don't dismiss but never said he had any involvement in 911

He did it. Your theory is bullshit. IBS is a fucking genius.

If you don't believe me prove IBS wrong.

 

[IceBergSLiM]

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
josh, never posted links to anything backing up any of your claims refuting mine. ( i did give links to much of my sources)

In fact nobody provided links our sources for any information used to supposed "own me and shit on me"

Why is it acceptable for you to toss out information without sources but when there are sources that we post you write them off as drivel. Something isn't right here.....you need to follow your own standards before you declare victory.

I didn't argue much of anything with you besides the Silverstein debacle. You just posted links showing the cost of his lease/his insurance pay out. Like the rest of your conspiracy theorists you just put these two together and figured it's a sure-shot. I will collect all my sources if you will shut up.

If he retains no lease rights to the freedom tower there is still 6.4 million sq ft of space in towers 2,3,4 which he definitely still holds.

6,400,000 x $500 = $3,100,000,000 /month

3 billion per month is much much more than my initial estimate of 1 billion. Thanks for clarifying. Plus any money he is borrowing through liberty bonds are tax exempt with lower than market interest rates.

 

[Josh]

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
josh, never posted links to anything backing up any of your claims refuting mine. ( i did give links to much of my sources)

In fact nobody provided links our sources for any information used to supposed "own me and shit on me"

Why is it acceptable for you to toss out information without sources but when there are sources that we post you write them off as drivel. Something isn't right here.....you need to follow your own standards before you declare victory.

I didn't argue much of anything with you besides the Silverstein debacle. You just posted links showing the cost of his lease/his insurance pay out. Like the rest of your conspiracy theorists you just put these two together and figured it's a sure-shot. I will collect all my sources if you will shut up.

If he retains no lease rights to the freedom tower there is still 6.4 million sq ft of space in towers 2,3,4 which he definitely still holds.

6,400,000 x $500 = $3,100,000,000 /month

3 billion per month is much much more than my initial estimate of 1 billion. Thanks for clarifying. Plus any money he is borrowing through liberty bonds are tax exempt with lower than market interest rates.

Ok, so you are telling me he's going to make $3 billion a month. We'll just say for the hell of it that's accurate. That's $36bn a year. Let's say $6bn in expenses. In two years by that estimate he will be in the Top 3 richest people in the world. In three years, he will (by your estimates) have $90 billion. :laugh: Does that REALLY make sense to you?

 

[IceBergSLiM]

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: Ns1
ok fuck this shit

Silverstein did it. I'm sure of it now. IBS has opened up my mother fucking eyes, he did it for the money.

So if Silverstein did it, how the fuck could the US government do it? They clearly did not have as much to gain as Silverstein.

Unless, Silverstein was working in conjunction with the US government....

didn't someone write earlier that he lost the rights to some buildings? sounds like incentive to me!

I will keep saying that rich people will kill for money but will also keep saying I never said silverstein had anything to do with this incident, whether he killed others in the past for personal gain I don't dismiss but never said he had any involvement in 911

Upon further investigation it does look like he gave freedom tower rights back to NYPA as a concession for them basically cutting him some slack on the lease payments while he is rebuilding. Even though the freedom tower is 10 mil sq feet he still holds 6.4 mill sq ft in the other buildings 2,3,4. Now He looks like a good guy for doing the right thing giveing the freedom towers back to the state(how generous), so he gets state, federal cooperation and still has rights to the 3 buildings.

 

[MotF Bane]

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
josh, never posted links to anything backing up any of your claims refuting mine. ( i did give links to much of my sources)

In fact nobody provided links our sources for any information used to supposed "own me and shit on me"

Why is it acceptable for you to toss out information without sources but when there are sources that we post you write them off as drivel. Something isn't right here.....you need to follow your own standards before you declare victory.

I didn't argue much of anything with you besides the Silverstein debacle. You just posted links showing the cost of his lease/his insurance pay out. Like the rest of your conspiracy theorists you just put these two together and figured it's a sure-shot. I will collect all my sources if you will shut up.

If he retains no lease rights to the freedom tower there is still 6.4 million sq ft of space in towers 2,3,4 which he definitely still holds.

6,400,000 x $500 = $3,100,000,000 /month

3 billion per month is much much more than my initial estimate of 1 billion. Thanks for clarifying. Plus any money he is borrowing through liberty bonds are tax exempt with lower than market interest rates.

Ok, so you are telling me he's going to make $3 billion a month. We'll just say for the hell of it that's accurate. That's $36bn a year. Let's say $6bn in expenses. In two years by that estimate he will be in the Top 3 richest people in the world. In three years, he will (by your estimates) have $90 billion. :laugh: Does that REALLY make sense to you?

Oops.

 

[IceBergSLiM]

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
josh, never posted links to anything backing up any of your claims refuting mine. ( i did give links to much of my sources)

In fact nobody provided links our sources for any information used to supposed "own me and shit on me"

Why is it acceptable for you to toss out information without sources but when there are sources that we post you write them off as drivel. Something isn't right here.....you need to follow your own standards before you declare victory.

I didn't argue much of anything with you besides the Silverstein debacle. You just posted links showing the cost of his lease/his insurance pay out. Like the rest of your conspiracy theorists you just put these two together and figured it's a sure-shot. I will collect all my sources if you will shut up.

If he retains no lease rights to the freedom tower there is still 6.4 million sq ft of space in towers 2,3,4 which he definitely still holds.

6,400,000 x $500 = $3,100,000,000 /month

3 billion per month is much much more than my initial estimate of 1 billion. Thanks for clarifying. Plus any money he is borrowing through liberty bonds are tax exempt with lower than market interest rates.

Ok, so you are telling me he's going to make $3 billion a month. We'll just say for the hell of it that's accurate. That's $36bn a year. Let's say $6bn in expenses. In two years by that estimate he will be in the Top 3 richest people in the world. In three years, he will (by your estimates) have $90 billion. :laugh: Does that REALLY make sense to you?

unFortunately money doesn't work like that. You can't keep everything you earn. His over head is probably way way way more than 6 billion annually. No doubt he will be one of the richest in the world but it won't happen in 3 years.

I think the point here is anyway you slice it he will be making a killing for years to come and long after he is gone.

 

[Josh]

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: Ns1
ok fuck this shit

Silverstein did it. I'm sure of it now. IBS has opened up my mother fucking eyes, he did it for the money.

So if Silverstein did it, how the fuck could the US government do it? They clearly did not have as much to gain as Silverstein.

Unless, Silverstein was working in conjunction with the US government....

didn't someone write earlier that he lost the rights to some buildings? sounds like incentive to me!

I will keep saying that rich people will kill for money but will also keep saying I never said silverstein had anything to do with this incident, whether he killed others in the past for personal gain I don't dismiss but never said he had any involvement in 911

Upon further investigation it does look like he gave freedom tower rights back to NYPA as a concession for them basically cutting him some slack on the lease payments while he is rebuilding. Even though the freedom tower is 10 mil sq feet he still holds 6.4 mill sq ft in the other buildings 2,3,4. Now He looks like a good guy for doing the right thing giveing the freedom towers back to the state(how generous), so he gets state, federal cooperation and still has rights to the 3 buildings.

Right - looks like for some reason he was having a tough time making those lease payments with all those billions he got for free Hahahahhaha come on man, this is just common sense now. Your theory is rediculous.

 

[MotF Bane]

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
josh, never posted links to anything backing up any of your claims refuting mine. ( i did give links to much of my sources)

In fact nobody provided links our sources for any information used to supposed "own me and shit on me"

Why is it acceptable for you to toss out information without sources but when there are sources that we post you write them off as drivel. Something isn't right here.....you need to follow your own standards before you declare victory.

I didn't argue much of anything with you besides the Silverstein debacle. You just posted links showing the cost of his lease/his insurance pay out. Like the rest of your conspiracy theorists you just put these two together and figured it's a sure-shot. I will collect all my sources if you will shut up.

If he retains no lease rights to the freedom tower there is still 6.4 million sq ft of space in towers 2,3,4 which he definitely still holds.

6,400,000 x $500 = $3,100,000,000 /month

3 billion per month is much much more than my initial estimate of 1 billion. Thanks for clarifying. Plus any money he is borrowing through liberty bonds are tax exempt with lower than market interest rates.

Ok, so you are telling me he's going to make $3 billion a month. We'll just say for the hell of it that's accurate. That's $36bn a year. Let's say $6bn in expenses. In two years by that estimate he will be in the Top 3 richest people in the world. In three years, he will (by your estimates) have $90 billion. :laugh: Does that REALLY make sense to you?

unFortunately money doesn't work like that. You can't keep everything you earn. His over head is probably way way way more than 6 billion annually. No doubt he will be one of the richest in the world but it won't happen in 3 years.

LOL are you serious?

 

[Ns1]

NO GUYS, YOU'RE FUCKING IT UP FOR ME.

IBS IS RIGHT. FUCK THE US GOVERNMENT, THAT GUY CAN MAKE 30BN A MOTHER FUCKING YEAR!!!!! HE TOTALLY DID IT. TOTALLY.

 

[DisgruntledVirus]

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: Ns1
ok fuck this shit

Silverstein did it. I'm sure of it now. IBS has opened up my mother fucking eyes, he did it for the money.

So if Silverstein did it, how the fuck could the US government do it? They clearly did not have as much to gain as Silverstein.

Unless, Silverstein was working in conjunction with the US government....

didn't someone write earlier that he lost the rights to some buildings? sounds like incentive to me!

I will keep saying that rich people will kill for money but will also keep saying I never said silverstein had anything to do with this incident, whether he killed others in the past for personal gain I don't dismiss but never said he had any involvement in 911

Upon further investigation it does look like he gave freedom tower rights back to NYPA as a concession for them basically cutting him some slack on the lease payments while he is rebuilding. Even though the freedom tower is 10 mil sq feet he still holds 6.4 mill sq ft in the other buildings 2,3,4. Now He looks like a good guy for doing the right thing giveing the freedom towers back to the state(how generous), so he gets state, federal cooperation and still has rights to the 3 buildings.

OMG we got one of the 3 to admit they were wrong about something. Holy effin shiat.

 

[IceBergSLiM]

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: Ns1
ok fuck this shit

Silverstein did it. I'm sure of it now. IBS has opened up my mother fucking eyes, he did it for the money.

So if Silverstein did it, how the fuck could the US government do it? They clearly did not have as much to gain as Silverstein.

Unless, Silverstein was working in conjunction with the US government....

didn't someone write earlier that he lost the rights to some buildings? sounds like incentive to me!

I will keep saying that rich people will kill for money but will also keep saying I never said silverstein had anything to do with this incident, whether he killed others in the past for personal gain I don't dismiss but never said he had any involvement in 911

Upon further investigation it does look like he gave freedom tower rights back to NYPA as a concession for them basically cutting him some slack on the lease payments while he is rebuilding. Even though the freedom tower is 10 mil sq feet he still holds 6.4 mill sq ft in the other buildings 2,3,4. Now He looks like a good guy for doing the right thing giveing the freedom towers back to the state(how generous), so he gets state, federal cooperation and still has rights to the 3 buildings.

Right - looks like for some reason he was having a tough time making those lease payments with all those billions he got for free Hahahahhaha come on man, this is just common sense now. Your theory is rediculous.

commom sense says that he will be generating billions annually and any debt he incurs now will be nothing compared to what wealth will be generated for years to come. Surely his sons will take over the business this will be another american family dynasty. watch.

 

[MotF Bane]

Originally posted by: Ns1
NO GUYS, YOU'RE FUCKING IT UP FOR ME.

IBS IS RIGHT. FUCK THE US GOVERNMENT, THAT GUY CAN MAKE 30BN A MOTHER FUCKING YEAR!!!!! HE TOTALLY DID IT. TOTALLY.

Guys, we lost Ns1. They got him. Goddamned Canadians!

 

[irishScott]

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: irishScott
Video 5:

1. See previous.

2. I wonder how an Ex-KGB agent without a given background is suddenly an expert on the equipment used on the moon, the nature of the lunar surface, physics, and other areas relatively outside the purview of an intelligence operative?

2a. IE: The video clearly shows that the flag wasn't "waving in the wind". Atmosphere or no atmosphere, the flag is attached to a pole that is shifting position. By any laws of physics It's going to move. Given the way it's mounted, it's probably going to move around a vertical axis (the pole maybe? :shocked

3. The narrator contradicts himself. If all photos were destroyed, how did he come across an undeveloped roll of film?

4. Ambrose Chapel. Who the hell... As far as I'm concerned he's just another guy with no proof. He says a lot with nothing to back it up.

oh and btw, whether or not he's a 'physics' expert, you have NOTHING to say about the key points he brings up such as the spotlights and lighting among all the other inconsistencies.

If you insist:
Those are spotlights? I've been on stage quite a few times (in chorus since 5th grade). I have never seen any spotlight that looks like that from any angle, and I've been under ancient spotlights from the 70s.

Those "spotlights" could be any number of camera defects.

 

[IceBergSLiM]

ok so if my numbers are ridiculously inflated then lets just do $100 per sq ft

thats 640 million per month thats 7.6 billion per year. I think he can live with that. And in 10 or 20 years it would certainly put the Silverstein name(whether him or his heirs) on the richest in the world list.

This estimate is lower than the average ( http://findarticles.com/p/arti...is_16_54/ai_n21175945)

Plus this is the most desirable real estate in the world hardly "average" This is state of the art premier primo #1 top grade A real estate space. Its going to yield well beyond the bargain basement $100

 

[NoCreativity]

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

If he retains no lease rights to the freedom tower there is still 6.4 million sq ft of space in towers 2,3,4 which he definitely still holds.

6,400,000 x $500 = $3,100,000,000 /month

3 billion per month is much much more than my initial estimate of 1 billion. Thanks for clarifying. Plus any money he is borrowing through liberty bonds are tax exempt with lower than market interest rates.

What would he have been making per month with the old WTC for the last seven years? How many square feet of office space did he originally lease and what was he charging per foot as rent? What is the increase in office space and rent?

 

[jonks]

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
ok so if my numbers are ridiculously inflated then lets just do $100 per sq ft

thats 640 million per month thats 7.6 billion per year. I think he can live with that. And in 10 or 20 years it would certainly put the Silverstein name(whether him or his heirs) on the richest in the world list.

This estimate is lower than the average ( http://findarticles.com/p/arti...is_16_54/ai_n21175945)

Plus this is the most desirable real estate in the world hardly "average" This is state of the art premier primo #1 top grade A real estate space. Its going to yield well beyond the bargain basement $100

And all he had to do was murder thousands of innocent people when he already held a 99 year lease on the property. Genius. I know it's easy to throw this shit out like you do because you never met the guy and he's just some name on a conspiracy website but consider for a minute that this is a real person who you could theoretically sit down and talk with. Imagine instead of being the caricature of a James Bond villian you realize he's just a business man with a family who has lived in NY for the last 70 years and might have a little problem with mass murder. Nah, you're right, he probably did it.

I'm changing my theory. It was Exxon. Their profits are currently breaking all records. They did it.

 

[IceBergSLiM]

Originally posted by: NoCreativity

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

If he retains no lease rights to the freedom tower there is still 6.4 million sq ft of space in towers 2,3,4 which he definitely still holds.

6,400,000 x $500 = $3,100,000,000 /month

3 billion per month is much much more than my initial estimate of 1 billion. Thanks for clarifying. Plus any money he is borrowing through liberty bonds are tax exempt with lower than market interest rates.

What would he have been making per month with the old WTC for the last seven years? How many square feet of office space did he originally lease and what was he charging per foot as rent? What is the increase in office space and rent?

u know as well as I there is no possible way to produce that information at this point. I don't have those resources and neither does anyone on this board. They are good questions but cannot be answered.

 

[Ns1]

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
ok so if my numbers are ridiculously inflated then lets just do $100 per sq ft

thats 640 million per month thats 7.6 billion per year. I think he can live with that. And in 10 or 20 years it would certainly put the Silverstein name(whether him or his heirs) on the richest in the world list.

This estimate is lower than the average ( http://findarticles.com/p/arti...is_16_54/ai_n21175945)

Plus this is the most desirable real estate in the world hardly "average" This is state of the art premier primo #1 top grade A real estate space. Its going to yield well beyond the bargain basement $100

And all he had to do was murder thousands of innocent people when he already held a 99 year lease on the property. Genius.

I'm changing my theory. It was Exxon. Their profits are currently breaking all records. They did it.

NO. SILVERSTEIN DID IT ASSHOLE.

 

[IceBergSLiM]

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
ok so if my numbers are ridiculously inflated then lets just do $100 per sq ft

thats 640 million per month thats 7.6 billion per year. I think he can live with that. And in 10 or 20 years it would certainly put the Silverstein name(whether him or his heirs) on the richest in the world list.

This estimate is lower than the average ( http://findarticles.com/p/arti...is_16_54/ai_n21175945)

Plus this is the most desirable real estate in the world hardly "average" This is state of the art premier primo #1 top grade A real estate space. Its going to yield well beyond the bargain basement $100

And all he had to do was murder thousands of innocent people when he already held a 99 year lease on the property. Genius.

I'm changing my theory. It was Exxon. Their profits are currently breaking all records. They did it.

He only needed to know about it to capitalize on it. It didn't even have to be his idea or have any part in it whatsoever other than simply knowing about it ahead of time.