IndyColtsFan
Lifer
- Sep 22, 2007
- 33,656
- 687
- 126
The Korean War ended?
IIRC, technically, SK and NK are still at war.
The Korean War ended?
The Chinese will do nothing. Everyone knows this.
just like the chinese did nothing previously.......lolol
They all but sent us back to the 38th parallel with our tails between our legs..lol
They still have a shitload of artillery within range of Seoul. The bitch slap of death would probably need to include tactical nukes along the DMZ at least.
... you know that might just work. If we flatten all the artillery in range of Seoul it should be much easier to dull the North's response.
I suspect that there will be some form of retaliation against NK but it won't be publicly disclosed or conducted openly.
That would be the best response.I suspect that there will be some form of retaliation against NK but it won't be publicly disclosed or conducted openly.
Nah...sanctions?
Are they fortified and concealed in such a way that a South Korean preemptive strike could not eliminate the vast majority of them before they have a chance to do significant damage to Seoul?
(Note: I am not advocating a US preemptive strike, the South Koreans need to make that call, not the US)
sanctions?
Tactical nukes would be an awful idea because it would give people like Iran more excuses to develop and even use nukes.
I wonder if some carpet bombing of the NK artillery would be enough to scatter their troops and prevent them from a massive attack on Seoul?
Tactical nukes would be an awful idea because it would give people like Iran more excuses to develop and even use nukes.
You would probably need to coordinate a decapitation strike at their leadership while simulataneously taking out their artillery in and around the DMZ. Also, IIRC (I could be wrong), they do have missiles capable of hitting Japan so you'd want to knock those out too.
I don't think any of this is really on anyone's radar at this point, and the current policy of isolating NK will continue. I think the only way we would ever go to war with NK is if they invaded SK -- I don't think the American people would support losing a single American soldier otherwise, and I would agree with that logic.
you wouldn't die for this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_CslUnBmXc&playnext_from=TL&videos=DBPEb6flJu0
I am just shocked that the International response is so weak or non-caring....A military ship was sunk and over 40 sailors were killed by the torpedoe of an enemy submarine.
How is that not an act of war??
Of course, if it was a US Navy ship that was hit, Obama would apologize to the other nation for allowing our ship to get in the way of their torpedo. Hell, he would probably reimburse them for the cost of the torpedo as a sign of good will...
sanctions?
Nearly half the population of SK is in range of deep, dug-in artillery. I'm not sure what else you could do. Risking the lives of 20 million people for death of 46 takes some big balls.
you wouldn't die for this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_CslUnBmXc&playnext_from=TL&videos=DBPEb6flJu0
The only Nork artillery guns or MRLS that can reach central Seoul from behind the North Korean border are the M-1978 Koksan guns, and in order to do this they would need to be moved close to the border where they would be vulnerable. North Korea is suspected to have a few hundred of these and there are only 17 hardened artillery sites within 55Km of central Seoul.
The real threat is ballistic missiles with chemical warheads.