I know reading is hard, but c'mon, it's not THAT hard. Door handles and seat belts must drive you absolutely insane. (Come to think of it, that would explain a lot . . .)
The first link is not the actual 300+ page proposal referenced, it's an overview of the May 2014 with commissioners' pro and con statements attached. The second link is a short cheerleading blog telling us how wonderful it will be. The third and fourth are guides telling us how wonderful it will be. Nothing in here tells us exactly what IT says.
Title II regulation of the Internet service providers (assuming the courts allow it) will likely have some very good things, possibly some bad things, and a lot of meh things carved out for specific interest groups. But I'll repeat; politicians are not in the habit of hiding the text of proposed bills because they would make their subjects too happy.
And if you're content knowing that the people who will vote on this proposed law can read it even if you can't, you are exactly what is wrong with this nation as we transition from citizens to subjects.
Step 1: complain that you can't read the proposal.
Step 2: complain that FCC statements regarding the proposal aren't good enough.
Step 3: complain that even if you had the entire 300+ page proposal that you and most people couldn't read it and understand it anyway.
Citizens to Subjects? Nope. You're still able to vote for politicians who run the government, as directed by the US Constitution.
You're happy to go from Citizen to Consumer, though.
Defend the corporations who want to control the internet and who has access to it, like a good consumer. I'll be much happier when the people through their representatives are able to curtail how much corporations are able to control our means of communication.
Your first amendment right applies against the government. It doesn't apply against Comcast and Disney.