Originally posted by: Exterous
In retrospect I think this is what is happening:
There is a message post. If the user goes in to edit the post and is finished before the minute of the post time changes it resets the post time to the end of the minute. This allows anyone else who posted within that minute to appear before the person doing the editing - if that makes any sense at all
Originally posted by: thecrecarc
Originally posted by: Exterous
In retrospect I think this is what is happening:
There is a message post. If the user goes in to edit the post and is finished before the minute of the post time changes it resets the post time to the end of the minute. This allows anyone else who posted within that minute to appear before the person doing the editing - if that makes any sense at all
I disagree, Clair de Lune in the thread also snuck in between me, and I did not edit my posts. Also, this theory does not hold true on the instance where he quoted the person under him, both of whom did not edit their posts.
The only reasonable explanation is that Clair de Lune is secretly John Titor.
Originally posted by: Raiden256
Originally posted by: lokiju
What does it mean when an article has [sic] in it?
It means "we know the word before this is misspelled / bad grammar, but it's a quoted reference, so we're leaving it in" as I understand it.
Originally posted by: lokiju
What does it mean when an article has [sic] in it?
I see it all the time on sites like Engadget and Gizmodo but have no clue what it's there for.
Originally posted by: Perknose
Drat . . . third one to that party.
Originally posted by: NSFW
Originally posted by: Perknose
Drat . . . third one to that party.
dirty thirds?
Originally posted by: Salvatore
Could someone explain what >* means?
Originally posted by: Salvatore
The first time I saw it, it was sent from my sister's boyfriend to my sister. I always figured it meant it was greater than getting head.
Originally posted by: NSFW
Originally posted by: Salvatore
The first time I saw it, it was sent from my sister's boyfriend to my sister. I always figured it meant it was greater than getting head.
pics of sister?
Originally posted by: Salvatore
The first time I saw it, it was sent from my sister's boyfriend to my sister. I always figured it meant it was greater than getting head.
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: lokiju
What does it mean when an article has [sic] in it?
I see it all the time on sites like Engadget and Gizmodo but have no clue what it's there for.
[sic] in a quoted article indicates the word before it is an error, but has not been changed to perserve [sic] the full integrity of the quote.
Originally posted by: Evadman
I predict that NSFW will want pics of Salvatore's sister.
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: lokiju
What does it mean when an article has [sic] in it?
I see it all the time on sites like Engadget and Gizmodo but have no clue what it's there for.
[sic] in a quoted article indicates the word before it is an error, but has not been changed to perserve [sic] the full integrity of the quote.
Originally posted by: Salvatore
The first time I saw it, it was sent from my sister's boyfriend to my sister. I always figured it meant it was greater than getting head.
Originally posted by: Evadman
I predict that NSFW will want pics of Salvatore's sister.