The only device that can challenge the iPad 2 in this benchmark will be the OMAP 44x based PlayBook, which also has ARM's NEON tech. With ~100Mhz extra per core it will be interesting, to say the least.Well, looks like even CPU performance is not the same anymore. Ars Technica ran LINPACK:
http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2011/03/ipad-2-the-ars-review.ars/5
iPad 2 is almost 4 times faster at floating point performance than iPad.
Interesting to note is that the XOOM and its dual-core ARM A9 is hopelessly outclassed once again. Galaxy Tab doesn't even come close.
Well, looks like even CPU performance is not the same anymore. Ars Technica ran LINPACK:
http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2011/03/ipad-2-the-ars-review.ars/5
iPad 2 is almost 4 times faster at floating point performance than iPad.
Interesting to note is that the XOOM and its dual-core ARM A9 is hopelessly outclassed once again. Galaxy Tab doesn't even come close.
The only device that can challenge the iPad 2 in this benchmark will be the OMAP 44x based PlayBook, which also has ARM's NEON tech. With ~100Mhz extra per core it will be interesting, to say the least.
Well, looks like even CPU performance is not the same anymore. Ars Technica ran LINPACK:
http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2011/03/ipad-2-the-ars-review.ars/5
iPad 2 is almost 4 times faster at floating point performance than iPad.
Interesting to note is that the XOOM and its dual-core ARM A9 is hopelessly outclassed once again. Galaxy Tab doesn't even come close.
Well, looks like even CPU performance is not the same anymore. Ars Technica ran LINPACK:
http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2011/03/ipad-2-the-ars-review.ars/5
iPad 2 is almost 4 times faster at floating point performance than iPad.
Interesting to note is that the XOOM and its dual-core ARM A9 is hopelessly outclassed once again. Galaxy Tab doesn't even come close.
Update: At the request of several readers, we performed another video test but with the WiFi off and airplane mode on. With these settings (and still at 50 percent brightness), we were able to get about 13 hours and 20 minutes of battery life.
I suppose, if that suits your assertion. Prior to the iPad 2 release you and others like you were all too quick to state that any tablet should be rated against the forthcoming iPad 2, rather than the available iPad 1. :hmm:
Consider yourself busted.The iPad1 was already a year old, the iPad2 and XOOM are new. :hmm:
BACK TO TOPIC.... I don't understnad how the iPad 2 outperforms so much. Isn't this all the same generation of CPUs? I thought the A4 was like the Hummingbird and the A5 was similar to the Exynos? No?
If Android can just make its UI snappy, I swear half of its issues would go away.
BACK TO TOPIC.... I don't understnad how the iPad 2 outperforms so much. Isn't this all the same generation of CPUs? I thought the A4 was like the Hummingbird and the A5 was similar to the Exynos? No?
You people are crazy. I got my shipping notice from Apple today. Mine should arrive early next week.
BACK TO TOPIC.... I don't understnad how the iPad 2 outperforms so much. Isn't this all the same generation of CPUs? I thought the A4 was like the Hummingbird and the A5 was similar to the Exynos? No?
Linpack is kind of an application that just calls OS APIs to calculate something, so it's all up to the OS to do whatever it takes to achieve the best output.
Based on the results, you're seeing boss-level optimizations in iOS (possibly combining both VFP and NEON somehow), which results in the iPad 1 performing almost on the same level as the XOOM's Tegra 2 Cortex A9 design. But comparing the XOOM's Tegra 2 against the Galaxy Tab's Hummingbird and you can see the Cortex A9 offering some benefits. If we are talking about raw performance and proper OS optimization or same-OS performance, I'd say it's safe to assume Tegra 2 should be twice as fast as A4.
But regarding the A5, the CPU likely has super beefed-up vector processing units beyond standard Cortex A9 specs, so it's like a completely different chip from the Cortex A9 altogether. I'm not sure about Exynos until we start seeing results comparing Exynos vs Tegra 2 to really judge raw performance, but I don't doubt Exynos and A5 might be different since A5 just went into mass production in January this year, and Exynos likely have been designed a bit before that. It's not like Apple threw the A5 design on the table for Samsung to steal or anything.
This is mostly a showcase of iOS vs Android in terms of optimizations and performance, if you are reading beyond the fact that the iPad 2 is 4 times faster than the iPad 1, that is.
And either way, these facts remain: iPad 1 is on the same level as XOOM in some cases. Galaxy Tab is not even up for competition. iPad 2 is way ahead of anything else.
I'm not sure about Exynos until we start seeing results comparing Exynos vs Tegra 2 to really judge raw performance
But regarding the A5, the CPU likely has super beefed-up vector processing units beyond standard Cortex A9 specs, so it's like a completely different chip from the Cortex A9 altogether. I'm not sure about Exynos until we start seeing results comparing Exynos vs Tegra 2 to really judge raw performance, but I don't doubt Exynos and A5 might be different since A5 just went into mass production in January this year, and Exynos likely have been designed a bit before that. It's not like Apple threw the A5 design on the table for Samsung to steal or anything.
I can't wait until the NGP comes out and beasts every single handheld device out there by a large margin in benchmarks.
it's gonna be so hilarious..
Consider yourself busted.
The only thing hilarious about it is you actually comparing a handheld console to a tablet computer or a smartphone.
The battery life on these "iDevices" is really what is starting to win me over to that camp. I mean holy shit. Full video @ 50% brightness + more and ~13h battery life? I have not researched other tablets at all but have a feeling the competition wouldn't even make it through two movies before needing a charge. If I'm wrong I'm probably not wrong by much...