Originally posted by: jagec
I AM A CORPORATE WHORE
IF YOU CAN READ THIS, MY BATTERY DIED
WARNING: FLOOR MODEL FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES ONLY. PLEASE RETURN TO BEST BUY.
Sampson: I agree with part of what you're saying, I just would never buy something that cost $300 just to play music. So, I make fun of ALL those expensive MP3 players...but since the iPod is the most expensive, it gets made fun of most
But if you own something popular, and knew that there was a superior product out there, you ARE a sheep most of the time.
Looks like someone took another user's post out of context!Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
"Sucker"
Originally posted by: jst0ney
dont' get it engraved. It kills the resale.
Originally posted by: Gurck
On the "I don't need/want extra features, sound quality, or battery life" argument - that's fine, not everyone needs the extra features some other players have - but why not save $100+ and buy another player without them? Certainly not everything popular is bad, and I doubt anyone here dislikes iPods because of their popularity. Simply put, money only goes so far. Most DAP manufacturers put it into quality construction, features, and innovation. Apple just pays U2 and pockets the rest. And, true to form, the vast majority of consumers are swayed more by advertising than by logic.
Plus you never know when you'll come to want/need a feature. Things change. You may have a few bucks to spare, for instance, and pick up some good headphones - at which time you'll realize the iPod's limited sound quality. You may at that point also realize how much better .ogg really does sound than .mp3. You may get sick of charging it every day. Etcetera...
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
Another worthless stab at Apple :roll: Yes Apple pays U2, but Apple also sells the U2 iPod for more money. If you don't want Apple or U2 to pocket the extra $$, don't buy the U2 iPod!
I don't know why I bother. The sales prove that Apple has a quality product.
I don't have an iPod or any other MP3 player...Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
Another worthless stab at Apple :roll: Yes Apple pays U2, but Apple also sells the U2 iPod for more money. If you don't want Apple or U2 to pocket the extra $$, don't buy the U2 iPod!
I don't know why I bother. The sales prove that Apple has a quality product.
Typical illogic from a typical iPod end user (I'd say buyer, but the typical iPod buyer is the end user's parents). Sales, especially in the tech sector, don't indicate quality. By your logic, Apple makes terrible computers and AOL is a good ISP. Look sport, we already know you're 12 and ride the short bus. You don't have to continue proving it with every post you make.
Originally posted by: Gurck
I didn't say you had one, I said you're the type - young & dumb enough to want whatever you see commercials for on the boob tube and to not take price into consideration, since you're not the one who'd be paying. I'm guessing payments on the trailer take precedence over a DAP for you, kudos to your parents for keeping their priorities straight on that, at least. Apple has nowhere near the sales volume of PC & PC part manufacturers, not sure where you're coming from with that one. Your personal attacks never cease; mine are in response, as my goal is to communicate and those of your age & intelligence level rarely understand calm logic and a nonoffensive manner. You've proven time and time again to be a prime example.
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
Wow, three more personal attacks on me. That brings the total to five while I have done nothing to you. If you really want to get your point across, I recommend that you don't belittle people who simply disagree with your standpoint. Feel free to post when you grow up, then I'd be willing to have a civil discussion.
I don't understand how posting quotes of me proving you wrong explains your personal attacks to me?Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
Wow, three more personal attacks on me. That brings the total to five while I have done nothing to you. If you really want to get your point across, I recommend that you don't belittle people who simply disagree with your standpoint. Feel free to post when you grow up, then I'd be willing to have a civil discussion.
Well, let's see...
Text
Then there's Text
Hrmmm, Text
Should I continue? That's just what a few minutes turned up and concerning me only; I didn't bother with the rest, or with posts where you personally attack others.
Don't blame me, you painted yourself into this corner kiddo
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
Don't listen to Gurck, he doesn't know what he's talking about.... he went from saying this about the ipod's interface:
"Not everyone enjoys a user interface that treats them like a 5 year old either"
To this:
"Interface is nice"
Wow! I wonder what Apple changed in 10 days! (nothing)
Also, Gurck says this:
Then says:Originally posted by: Gurck
Look & feel are subjective.
clearly "low sound quality" is a subjective comment. It may not have sound quality that is rated as high as some other mp3 players, but to say that the quality is actually "low" is quite subjective.Originally posted by: Gurck
Other downsides to it are low sound quality
If you want advice about an mp3 player, Anandtech Off Topic is a great place to ask, just ignore the biased fools who don't know what they're talking about.
Hey man I'm not the one who came in here attacking others for no reason. I agree that this is quite ridiculousOriginally posted by: buck
Jeebus can you two girls just PM eachother? FFS
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
I don't understand how posting quotes of me proving you wrong explains your personal attacks to me?
Nice try, jailbird
Hey, just because I called you out after you said the iPod's interface is nice 10 days after you said it was crappy, doesn't give you the right to attack me personallyOriginally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
I don't understand how posting quotes of me proving you wrong explains your personal attacks to me?
Nice try, jailbird
Only thing you "proved" in any of those threads is that you lied a few posts up in this one and that namecalling is your M.O., which generally indicates young age and a low IQ.
Jailbird? This another one of your misinterpretations due to the fact that you still haven't mastered the basics fo reading?