i just cant justify a 200 mp3 player for its size.
IMHO, personally, its so freaking small, I might actually lose it.
I wont even notice when it fell off my pocket if at all.
another thing, IMHO:
pockets: we usually put a wallet, keys and a cellphone if at all unless you perfer the belt attachment for cell phone.
why not go with a PSP?
Just because of its size? Well I will go back to size with nano. With the PSP, a tad heavier like a cell phone but you know its in your pocket. You will know if it fell. Since we dont put much stuff in our pockets, why not the psp, espically with the price tag.
200 = ipod nano
200 = psp with 32mb
itunes - unknown price detail for 1,000 songs
psp 1gig sandisk = 75 or
acer 40gig external hdd = 120 + usb cable conveter from acer to psp = 10 total 130
or combo acer + usb + scandisk memory = 200 + psp 200 = grand total 400
with acer, your walking around with literally 40 gigs worth of music in any format, movies in any format, pics, and games.
with the psp, you can play back the current mpg4, avi, midi, wav, mp3, possibliy divx (still has bugs with homebrew scene), roms, emulators, hell even PSP sony ISO games that are currently out if your a pirate....
have it all in your 40gig hdd, and with 1 gig memory stick, switch it the stuff u need freely, ANYWHERE..
so either you got a 41 gig MUSIC player or a multi-functioning gadget that imho outperforms a mp3 player anyday with the current price.
sorry, not a sony fanboi, I do hate sony but this PSP is remarkable, until mp3 players drops thier cost significantly, I see no justification.. unless someone educates me in the reasoning of why ipod is so huge.. than pls inform my "IGNANT" a$$