manowar821
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2007
- 6,063
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: JD50
So what is your point? You are acting like he said that Bush did everything he could while the Dems did nothing. Everyone pretty much acknowledges that prior to 9/11, no one did much to combat terrorism. Great example of a strawman though...
Originally posted by: JD50
None, why would you think that there were any? Did someone say that there were Iraqis on any of those aircraft?
Speaking of doing nothing, JD, is your brain on summer vacation? C'mon. You can follow along.
1) Bush invaded Iraq (who had nothing to do with 9/11); and
2) I don't know what Chuckie thinks but he implies that fighting in Iraq is somehow retribution for 17 Saudi's participating in the 9/11 attacks.
Do try to keep up, JD.
Still on your strawman I see.
1) We didn't invade Iraq because of 9/11, remember the whole WMD thing?
2) I'll let chucky explain what he was implying, but I doubt its "retribution for 17 Saudi's participating in the 9/11 attacks", if so, thats just silly.
And you still completely ignored what I said.
"You are acting like he said that Bush did everything he could while the Dems did nothing. Everyone pretty much acknowledges that prior to 9/11, no one did much to combat terrorism."
No, no , NO. People pushing an agenda claim that "prior to 9/11, no one did much to combat terrorism." That is a complete lie. You may not simply claim that. This is exactly how people start believing BS stories and reasons for BS wars, and BS administrations.
Secondly, yeah, I remember the WMD thing. I also remember not finding any, and how they changed their story a few times, as to why we ever entered Iraq in the first place.
They're full of it. Why is that so hard to believe? Or perhaps you're fully aware of that, and you are pushing an agenda, too?