- Jun 24, 2003
- 29,582
- 12
- 76
http://in.reuters.com/article/...INIndia-29078820070821
Looks like the Iranians are spoiling for war more than we are.
Looks like the Iranians are spoiling for war more than we are.
Originally posted by: palehorse74
so we can just wait 48 hours and see what happens... Chances are that this alleged activity was more of a psyop than anything else.
Originally posted by: Nebor
I think we should drop pamplets in Iran. "Your government is rich and malevolent, and keeps you in poverty and unemployment."
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Originally posted by: Nebor
I think we should drop pamplets in Iran. "Your government is rich and malevolent, and keeps you in poverty and unemployment."
I think Iran should drop pamplets in the USA saying your government is propped up by debt,
GWB&co., is stupid, and you need regime change.
But thats the platform even the GOP will run on in 08.
umm, who in this thread said anything even remotely resembling those comments? I think you're seeing ghosts man... "The Ghosts of Threads Past." lol...Originally posted by: Skoorb
Oh the hypocrisy is thick with some of you lot isn't it? You totally support the idea of going into Pakistan with or without Mushareef's permission to take out Al Queda "since Pakistan isn't doing anything about it", but if Iran wants to take out a group in Iraq that Iraqis cannot control who are in conflict with Iran, suddenly it's an invasion?
Drop the double speak.
Originally posted by: palehorse74
umm, who in this thread said anything even remotely resembling those comments? I think you're seeing ghosts man... "The Ghosts of Threads Past." lol...Originally posted by: Skoorb
Oh the hypocrisy is thick with some of you lot isn't it? You totally support the idea of going into Pakistan with or without Mushareef's permission to take out Al Queda "since Pakistan isn't doing anything about it", but if Iran wants to take out a group in Iraq that Iraqis cannot control who are in conflict with Iran, suddenly it's an invasion?
Drop the double speak.
Heading things off at the passOriginally posted by: palehorse74
umm, who in this thread said anything even remotely resembling those comments? I think you're seeing ghosts man... "The Ghosts of Threads Past." lol...Originally posted by: Skoorb
Oh the hypocrisy is thick with some of you lot isn't it? You totally support the idea of going into Pakistan with or without Mushareef's permission to take out Al Queda "since Pakistan isn't doing anything about it", but if Iran wants to take out a group in Iraq that Iraqis cannot control who are in conflict with Iran, suddenly it's an invasion?
Drop the double speak.
Originally posted by: Harvey
I'm not usually one for conspiracy theories, but given the Bushwhackos' consistant history of lies and deception, how do we know it isn't another neocon scam on the American people to set up an excuse for attacking Iran?
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Oh the hypocrisy is thick with some of you lot isn't it? You totally support the idea of going into Pakistan with or without Mushareef's permission to take out Al Queda "since Pakistan isn't doing anything about it", but if Iran wants to take out a group in Iraq that Iraqis cannot control who are in conflict with Iran, suddenly it's an invasion?
Drop the double speak.
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Oh the hypocrisy is thick with some of you lot isn't it? You totally support the idea of going into Pakistan with or without Mushareef's permission to take out Al Queda "since Pakistan isn't doing anything about it", but if Iran wants to take out a group in Iraq that Iraqis cannot control who are in conflict with Iran, suddenly it's an invasion?
Drop the double speak.
Analogies don't apply to America. We're right. They're wrong. If they want to argue, we can fight over it, and see who's right when their country lies in ruin and a couple oil tankers lay at the bottom of the Gulf.
Originally posted by: manowar821
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Oh the hypocrisy is thick with some of you lot isn't it? You totally support the idea of going into Pakistan with or without Mushareef's permission to take out Al Queda "since Pakistan isn't doing anything about it", but if Iran wants to take out a group in Iraq that Iraqis cannot control who are in conflict with Iran, suddenly it's an invasion?
Drop the double speak.
Analogies don't apply to America. We're right. They're wrong. If they want to argue, we can fight over it, and see who's right when their country lies in ruin and a couple oil tankers lay at the bottom of the Gulf.
Ugh, and there are actually people who think this way, too.
Disgusting pigs.
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: manowar821
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Oh the hypocrisy is thick with some of you lot isn't it? You totally support the idea of going into Pakistan with or without Mushareef's permission to take out Al Queda "since Pakistan isn't doing anything about it", but if Iran wants to take out a group in Iraq that Iraqis cannot control who are in conflict with Iran, suddenly it's an invasion?
Drop the double speak.
Analogies don't apply to America. We're right. They're wrong. If they want to argue, we can fight over it, and see who's right when their country lies in ruin and a couple oil tankers lay at the bottom of the Gulf.
Ugh, and there are actually people who think this way, too.
Disgusting pigs.
Might makes right. The strong survive. That's the world we live in. Justice, law or peace hold no power without being backed with violence. That's why cops walk around with a belt full of weapons.
Nothing means squat without the force to back it up.
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: manowar821
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Oh the hypocrisy is thick with some of you lot isn't it? You totally support the idea of going into Pakistan with or without Mushareef's permission to take out Al Queda "since Pakistan isn't doing anything about it", but if Iran wants to take out a group in Iraq that Iraqis cannot control who are in conflict with Iran, suddenly it's an invasion?
Drop the double speak.
Analogies don't apply to America. We're right. They're wrong. If they want to argue, we can fight over it, and see who's right when their country lies in ruin and a couple oil tankers lay at the bottom of the Gulf.
Ugh, and there are actually people who think this way, too.
Disgusting pigs.
Might makes right. The strong survive. That's the world we live in. Justice, law or peace hold no power without being backed with violence. That's why cops walk around with a belt full of weapons.
Nothing means squat without the force to back it up.
Actually, Moonbeam gave props to Nebor's honesty and he is honest Part of what he says is correct on some levels even if we don't want to admit it.Originally posted by: manowar821
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Oh the hypocrisy is thick with some of you lot isn't it? You totally support the idea of going into Pakistan with or without Mushareef's permission to take out Al Queda "since Pakistan isn't doing anything about it", but if Iran wants to take out a group in Iraq that Iraqis cannot control who are in conflict with Iran, suddenly it's an invasion?
Drop the double speak.
Analogies don't apply to America. We're right. They're wrong. If they want to argue, we can fight over it, and see who's right when their country lies in ruin and a couple oil tankers lay at the bottom of the Gulf.
Ugh, and there are actually people who think this way, too.
Disgusting pigs.