Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: Todd33
Muslim countries can't have the nuke, just Christian ones? The only way to get a chair at the world table is to go nuclear.
I didnt know Russia, China, India, etc are "Christian countries."
Originally posted by: azazyel
Originally posted by: Engineer
Being a pro-US job nut and an anti trade deficit nut, I might just like your idea.
(oh, and none of the "you're simply a nut" jokes! )
It just annoys me that there are so many opportunities for the US to increase it's production and strengthen in economy but we don't do it. I thought that was the point of having a Republican Party.
One of these reactors would only provide power for about 4K people but it is almost completely meltdown proof. It's clean, it's renewable and it's safe and the Chinese are growing the output potential. If we could get on board and start manufacturing some of the parts we can set them up here and sell them to the ME. And because they use graphite balls with only specks of uranium they can't make weapons out them and they would have no excuse to continue their program if we can provide the power cheaper.
Also the whole war on drugs thing annoys the hell out of me. I don't know how much but because of the 'war' we have to import all of our hemp material which could easily be grown and processed here. I'm sure you remember this...
"A founding father of the Reagan Revolution has put his John Hancock on a pro-pot report.
Milton Friedman leads a list of more than 500 economists from around the U.S. who today will publicly endorse a Harvard University economist's report on the costs of marijuana prohibition and the potential revenue gains from the U.S. government instead legalizing it and taxing its sale. Ending prohibition enforcement would save $7.7 billion in combined state and federal spending, the report says, while taxation would yield up to $6.2 billion a year."
http://www.forbes.com/services/2005/06/02/cz_qh_0602pot.html
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
What does that have to do with this?
nevermind.
Originally posted by: The Boss
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: Todd33
Muslim countries can't have the nuke, just Christian ones? The only way to get a chair at the world table is to go nuclear.
I didnt know Russia, China, India, etc are "Christian countries."
I didn't know Russia was an Islamic state.
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Finally.
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Finally.
I thought you didn't like Shia muslims mOeeOm?
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Finally.
I thought you didn't like Shia muslims mOeeOm?
It doesn't matter if I like them or not, they are still Muslims in the end.
Originally posted by: raildogg
Thank you Bush, thank you Europe and thank you others for letting this happen. But oh well, keep focusing your attention on Iraq while the biggest danger to the world goes unnoticed.
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Finally.
I thought you didn't like Shia muslims mOeeOm?
It doesn't matter if I like them or not, they are still Muslims in the end.
WOW! change of strategy I'm surprise!!!
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: raildogg
Thank you Bush, thank you Europe and thank you others for letting this happen. But oh well, keep focusing your attention on Iraq while the biggest danger to the world goes unnoticed.
Why shouldn't they have nuclear weapons too?
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: raildogg
Thank you Bush, thank you Europe and thank you others for letting this happen. But oh well, keep focusing your attention on Iraq while the biggest danger to the world goes unnoticed.
Why shouldn't they have nuclear weapons too?
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Finally.
I thought you didn't like Shia muslims mOeeOm?
It doesn't matter if I like them or not, they are still Muslims in the end.
WOW! change of strategy I'm surprise!!!
wha?
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: raildogg
Thank you Bush, thank you Europe and thank you others for letting this happen. But oh well, keep focusing your attention on Iraq while the biggest danger to the world goes unnoticed.
Why shouldn't they have nuclear weapons too?
Why shouldn't a rogue thug like Quadaffi have nuclear weapons too? dont you realize that you are opening a whole new element here, and it all started back in 1994.
while we're at it, lets let Mugabe get some nukes too.
according to some here, dicators and rogue nations all deserve a nuclear weapon! 200 of them!
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: raildogg
Thank you Bush, thank you Europe and thank you others for letting this happen. But oh well, keep focusing your attention on Iraq while the biggest danger to the world goes unnoticed.
Why shouldn't they have nuclear weapons too?
Why shouldn't a rogue thug like Quadaffi have nuclear weapons too? dont you realize that you are opening a whole new element here, and it all started back in 1994.
while we're at it, lets let Mugabe get some nukes too.
according to some here, dicators and rogue nations all deserve a nuclear weapon! 200 of them!
Blah! blah! blah! blah!
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: raildogg
Thank you Bush, thank you Europe and thank you others for letting this happen. But oh well, keep focusing your attention on Iraq while the biggest danger to the world goes unnoticed.
Why shouldn't they have nuclear weapons too?
Why shouldn't a rogue thug like Quadaffi have nuclear weapons too? dont you realize that you are opening a whole new element here, and it all started back in 1994.
while we're at it, lets let Mugabe get some nukes too.
according to some here, dicators and rogue nations all deserve a nuclear weapon! 200 of them!
Blah! blah! blah! blah!
Ouch. When did you come out of the cage?
:Q He might have overdosed tonight!Originally posted by: MegaWorks
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: raildogg
Thank you Bush, thank you Europe and thank you others for letting this happen. But oh well, keep focusing your attention on Iraq while the biggest danger to the world goes unnoticed.
Why shouldn't they have nuclear weapons too?
Why shouldn't a rogue thug like Quadaffi have nuclear weapons too? dont you realize that you are opening a whole new element here, and it all started back in 1994.
while we're at it, lets let Mugabe get some nukes too.
according to some here, dicators and rogue nations all deserve a nuclear weapon! 200 of them!
Blah! blah! blah! blah!
Ouch. When did you come out of the cage?
Blah! blah! blah! blah!
Originally posted by: raildogg
:Q He might have overdosed tonight!Originally posted by: MegaWorks
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: raildogg
Thank you Bush, thank you Europe and thank you others for letting this happen. But oh well, keep focusing your attention on Iraq while the biggest danger to the world goes unnoticed.
Why shouldn't they have nuclear weapons too?
Why shouldn't a rogue thug like Quadaffi have nuclear weapons too? dont you realize that you are opening a whole new element here, and it all started back in 1994.
while we're at it, lets let Mugabe get some nukes too.
according to some here, dicators and rogue nations all deserve a nuclear weapon! 200 of them!
Blah! blah! blah! blah!
Ouch. When did you come out of the cage?
Blah! blah! blah! blah!
Originally posted by: raildogg
:Q He might have overdosed tonight!Originally posted by: MegaWorks
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: mOeeOm
Originally posted by: raildogg
Thank you Bush, thank you Europe and thank you others for letting this happen. But oh well, keep focusing your attention on Iraq while the biggest danger to the world goes unnoticed.
Why shouldn't they have nuclear weapons too?
Why shouldn't a rogue thug like Quadaffi have nuclear weapons too? dont you realize that you are opening a whole new element here, and it all started back in 1994.
while we're at it, lets let Mugabe get some nukes too.
according to some here, dicators and rogue nations all deserve a nuclear weapon! 200 of them!
Blah! blah! blah! blah!
Ouch. When did you come out of the cage?
Blah! blah! blah! blah!