trenchfoot
Lifer
- Aug 5, 2000
- 14,668
- 7,165
- 136
Suppose we held a vote, on whether to defend the oceans and global shipping or not...Business shall not be impeded.
I'm sure some people would vote no on defending the oceans and global shipping and what-not.Suppose we held a vote, on whether to defend the oceans and global shipping or not...
Is there an understanding that multiple people here would vote for us not to do so?
I never even considered it a possibility, but now I find myself curious as to why... and trying to imagine how that scenario would play out. How do you see it going?
They have retaken what was theirs in the first placeMeanwhile, Iran continues its long storied tradition of active piracy in the Gulf of Oman.
Houthis aren't the only ones who get to attack shipping and disrupt oil prices!
Iran’s navy seizes oil tanker in Gulf of Oman
If they want to fire into unrelated shipping containers, I am more than happy to have the US light them the fuck up. Again, fuck around and find out.It appears that the Yemeni's do not care, they've been bombed to 'to the stone age' for 9 years by the
It appears that the Yemeni's do not care, they've been bombed to 'to the stone age' for 9 years by the US/Saudi/UAE coalition during their civil war.
during their civil war.
Give me a fucking break.They've been bombed to 'to the stone age' for 9 years by the US.
Well the Houthis are launching on ships again today. We need to blow them out once and for all.
To avert a mass starvation and genocide of the people in Yemen, we forced the Saudis to give up their aim of stopping the terrorists.I guess the saudis haven’t been trying hard enough.
They are waiting for the PRC for a response.I guess the saudis haven’t been trying hard enough.
The Houthi's land assets should already have been turned into smoldering ruins along with Iran and all of the bad actors under their influence in the region.
Yes clearly the answer is more dead kids.To avert a mass starvation and genocide of the people in Yemen, we forced the Saudis to give up their aim of stopping the terrorists.
For humanitarian reasons, the Biden admin made a mistake there.
My vote was no.Suppose we held a vote, on whether to defend the oceans and global shipping or not...
Is there an understanding that multiple people here would vote for us not to do so?
I never even considered it a possibility, but now I find myself curious as to why... and trying to imagine how that scenario would play out. How do you see it going?
Please never support something you don't believe in. Supporting the military is different from supporting the people that send them to war.My vote was no.
That said, the Biden admin clearly voted yes. The decision has been made. I support my nation and armed forces.
If you don't like it here you can leave....nobody will try to stop you.You do realize how much the US is responsible as a bad actor who literally steered Iran into it's radical place it is in now right.
Oh wait, you are a right wing hack, you don't know shit about history or reality.
If you don't like it here you can leave....nobody will try to stop you.
I feel sad for you in that you must attack anyone who holds a different opinion. You sound like felix....only different.If my house has a rodent infestation, like it does with you people, I'd rather keep the house and fucking get rid of the rats.
I mean in reality the rats would be better comrades than you as as fellow citizens, But let's start there.
Destroy the infestation. Cure the disease.
You are like a sickness. A rot. A plague.
People who walk around with knives that have handles that are made from rhinoceros horn on their belts are being bombed back to the stone age? How can you tell?It appears that the Yemeni's do not care, they've been bombed to 'to the stone age' for 9 years by the US/Saudi/UAE coalition during their civil war.